SDAB 10008

CERTIFICATION RULES FOR OFFICES PERFORMING FIELD REVIEW OF FIRE DOOR ASSEMBLIES

PREFACE

Interconnected Licensing Standards: Framework and Implementation

The Interconnected Licensing Standards serve as a comprehensive rulebook, provided to all relevant stakeholders, for implementing the specific execution features mandated by the referenced material regulations. Developed and formally adopted by the SDAB (Standards Development and Adoption Body) following structured consultations with its Certification Advisory Committee, these standards are legally effective as of the date prominently indicated in the document header.

Applicability and Compliance
All new licenses issued, or existing licenses reissued, on or after the stated effective date must demonstrate full compliance with these standards. This requirement ensures uniformity, safety, and reliability across all certified operations.

Documentation of Revisions
To maintain transparency in the standards’ evolution:

• Technical Changes/Additions: A strong vertical line (|) in the document’s outer margin indicates a line or section that has been technically altered or expanded from the previous edition.
• Deletions: If a section or item has been removed due to a technical revision, a cancellation pointer (e.g., a deletion mark or note) is placed in the outer margin at the corresponding location.
  These visual cues allow users to quickly identify what has changed between versions, facilitating efficient updates to internal procedures.

Dynamic Nature of the Standards
The document acknowledges that these standards are not static. They “may be further amended as the need dictates,” allowing the SDAB to respond to technological advancements, emerging best practices, and evolving regulatory landscapes.

Provision for Alternative Standards
Recognizing that innovation may sometimes follow multiple paths, the standards include a critical flexibility clause. The SDAB may approve the use of alternative standards or methods, provided that the applicant (the “proponent”) submits convincing, validated data. This data must clearly demonstrate that the proposed alternatives are:

1. Substantially Equivalent: They achieve the same level of performance, safety, and intended outcome as the prescribed standards.
2. Generally Compliant: They meet the overarching objectives and essential requirements of the applicable certification framework.

This provision balances the need for consistent benchmarks with the flexibility to accommodate novel and potentially superior solutions.

Core Objectives and Rationale

The primary purpose of these Interconnected Licensing Standards is to translate broad regulatory principles into actionable, technical specifications. They exist to:

• Ensure Uniformity: Create a level playing field by providing a single, clear benchmark for all licensees.
• Guarantee Safety and Integrity: Specify minimum technical and operational requirements to protect public interest, infrastructure, and end-users.
• Provide Predictability: Offer clear guidelines for developers, manufacturers, and certifiers, reducing ambiguity and streamlining the compliance process.
• Maintain Relevance: Through its amendment process, the framework ensures standards remain current with technological and industrial progress.

Stakeholder Responsibilities

• Licensees/License Applicants: Must thoroughly understand and integrate these standards into their operations, designs, or products. They are responsible for preparing and submitting all required evidence of compliance.
• Certification Bodies: Must audit and assess applications against these standards impartially and consistently.
• The SDAB: Maintains the standards, facilitates amendments, and judiciously evaluates requests for equivalency.

In essence, this document establishes a living, technically detailed compliance framework. It mandates adherence to a common benchmark while intentionally creating pathways for innovative approaches that can demonstrably meet or exceed the framework’s core objectives. The combination of strict compliance rules, transparent revision tracking, and a formal equivalency process makes it a robust tool for regulated industry management.

1. PRESENTATION

1.1. Scope: These models put forward the prerequisites for SDAB-licensed Inspection Body (IBs) performing reviews of fire entryway congregations introduced in the field. IBs conforming to these models will have exhibited that they have the faculty, association, experience, information and ability to examine fire entryway congregations introduced in the field in agreement with determined necessities.

These measures are restricted to examination just as determined in NFPA Standard 80, segments 5.2.1 through 5.2.14.5 BIS IS 3614:Latest,BSI/JIS/DIN/ASTM/ISO and don’t have any significant bearing to the items or the plan or execution attributes of the items. These measures are viewed as supplemental necessities to ISO/IEC 17020 and to SDAB accreditation Models for Investigation Offices for organizations looking to lead assessments of recorded fire-appraised entryways introduced in the field.

These standards explicitly avoid posting of field-introduced fire entryways and explicitly reject observation of the item, except if occasional reconnaissance is coordinated by the authority having locale (AHJ).

1.2. Regulating and Reference Records: Distributions recorded underneath allude to current releases (except if generally expressed).

1.2.1. NFPA Standard 80 Norm for Fire Entryways and Other Opening Protectives, Areas 5.2.1 through 5.2.14.5 as it were.

1.2.2. ISO/IEC Standard 17020, Similarity evaluation – Prerequisites for the activity of different sorts of bodies performing investigation.

1.2.3. ISO/IEC Standard 17025, General prerequisites for the skill of testing and alignment research centers.

1.2.4. SDAB License Rules for Assessment Offices.

1.2.5. ISO/IEC Standard 17000, Similarity evaluation — Jargon and general standards.

1.2.6. BIS IS 3614:Latest,BSI/JIS/DIN/ASTM/ISO

2. DEFINITIONS

2.1. Endorsed: Satisfactory to the code official or authority having purview.

2.2. Authority Having Purview (AHP): An association, office, or individual liable for implementing the prerequisites of a code or standard, or for endorsing gear, materials, an establishment, or system.

2.3. Qualified Individual: An individual who, by ownership of a perceived degree, endorsement, proficient standing, or expertise, and who, by information, preparing, and experience, has shown the capacity to manage the topic, the work, or the task.

2.4. Investigation Office (IB): An association outfitting review administrations under these models, licensed by SDAB as per archives referred and these models. Review bodies might be outsider, second party, or inside office per referred to report. Review bodies are audited to as IBs in these rules.

2.5. Examination Name: For these rules, a mark, regardless of whether serialized, demonstrating that the fire entryway was assessed in situ as per the record referred of these measures. The assessment name will incorporate the date of investigation including the year and the posting number of the assessment organization. The name will state just that the entryway has been assessed. Model: Assessed per NFPA 80 Segment 5.2, BIS IS 3614: Latest, BSI/JIS/DIN/ASTM/ISO as it were.

2.6. Investigator: Staff properly prepared and qualified to assess items or frameworks or types of items or frameworks in a field establishment.

2.7. Recorded: Gear, materials, or administrations remembered for a rundown distributed by an association OK to the AHJ and worried about assessment of items or administrations. The association keeps up with intermittent examination of creation of recorded hardware or materials or occasional assessment of administrations, and the posting states either that the gear, material, or administration meets recognized guidelines or that it has been tried and viewed as reasonable for a predetermined reason. For these measures, a name is viewed as proof of posting.

2.8. Posting Organization: A laid out and perceived office consistently participated in directing tests or then again outfitting assessment administrations, when such office has been supported. An association licensed under ISO/IEC Standard 17065 to list an item by a perceived Certification Body (Stomach muscle) that is signatory to the Global Authorization Gathering (IAF-AB) Multilateral Acknowledgment Game plan (MLA). Allude likewise to meaning of Recorded.

2.9. Confirmation Imprint: The imprint or image applied by the posting office to demonstrate conformance to the pertinent item wellbeing standard (s), and to other appropriate requirement (s) as coordinated in these standards.

2.10. Specialized Director: A Cornerstone of Technical Integrity

The position of Specialized Director (often synonymous with Technical Director, Laboratory Director, or Director of Testing) is a critical, formally assigned role within any certified or accredited organization. This individual serves as the keystone for ensuring technical credibility, integrity, and regulatory compliance across all investigative or testing activities.

Core Responsibilities:

As defined, the role encompasses three primary pillars of accountability:

1. Oversight and Endorsement: The Specialized Director is the ultimate technical authority. They are responsible for the comprehensive supervision of all testing methodologies, procedures, and personnel. This includes approving standard operating procedures (SOPs), validating test methods, and formally endorsing—or signing off on—critical test reports and certificates of analysis. Their signature is a declaration of the work’s validity.
2. Guaranteeing Quality: The director is the steward of the organization’s Quality Management System (QMS) as it pertains to technical work. They ensure that all investigations adhere to predefined quality standards—such as ISO/IEC 17025 for testing laboratories. This involves overseeing internal audits, managing corrective actions for non-conformities, reviewing quality control data, and ensuring the proper calibration and maintenance of equipment.
3. Ensuring Technical Competence: This is a direct responsibility for the technical staff. The Specialized Director must verify and document the education, training, skills, and experience of all technical personnel. They authorize analysts to perform specific tests, ensure ongoing proficiency through testing and assessments, and foster a culture of continuous technical improvement.

Strategic Importance:

Beyond direct oversight, the Specialized Director acts as the crucial interface between the technical team and upper management or external bodies like the SDAB. They translate technical requirements into operational practice and provide assurance to clients, regulators, and certification bodies that the data produced is reliable, accurate, and defensible. In essence, this role is the organization’s institutional safeguard against technical error and the central figure in maintaining its licensed, certified status.

3. QUALIFICATION: Eligibility and Core Scope

Licensing administration services, as governed by the standards, are exclusively available to organizations—referred to as “bodies”—whose primary function is the provision of examination services. This term encompasses a broad range of systematic, technical investigations, including testing, analysis, inspection, calibration, and evaluation activities conducted against established standards or specifications. The fundamental qualification criterion is therefore organizational purpose: the applicant must demonstrably operate as a service provider in this technical domain.

Implications of the Qualification

This definition creates a clear boundary for the licensing framework. It is designed for:

• Testing and Calibration Laboratories: Entities that determine the properties or performance of materials, products, or systems.
• Inspection Bodies: Organizations that examine items, designs, or processes and report on their condition, compliance, or safety against specific requirements.
• Certification Bodies (for products or systems): While they may make conformity decisions, their eligibility hinges on conducting or overseeing the fundamental examination activities that inform that decision.

The license does not apply to manufacturers conducting only in-house quality control for their own products, nor to general consultancies that do not perform direct technical examinations. The “body” must offer these examination services as a distinct, accessible service to external clients or for regulatory purposes.

Connection to Compliance and the Specialized Director

Achieving and maintaining this licensed status is contingent upon the organization meeting all technical and managerial standards, most critically through the mandated role of the Specialized Director. This appointed individual is the lynchpin for ensuring that all examinations are conducted with the requisite technical competence, oversight, and quality assurance. The license, therefore, is not merely a registration but a formal recognition that the body has a defined structure—anchored by the Specialized Director—capable of producing reliable, authoritative examination results that meet the SDAB’s stringent requirements. Ultimately, the qualification establishes the who, while the connected standards dictate the how.

4. REQUIRED ESSENTIAL DATA
Investigation Organizations should show consistence with the accompanying prerequisites:

4.1. ISO/IEC Standard 17020, Similarity evaluation – Necessities for the activity of different sorts of bodies performing review.

4.2. SDAB Rules of Strategy for Assessment Organization License.

5. EXTRA DATA (AS APPROPRIATE)

5.1. Required Staff

5.1.1. Specialized Director: The IB will assign a specialized manager(s) (by whatever name) who will have liability regarding specialized administration of the investigation tasks. The specialized director will be a certified individual with experience in fire entryway get together investigation or functional testing of fire entryway gatherings, and additionally proficient accreditation with exhibited field assessment experience in business fire entryway congregations.

5.1.2. Monitor: The IB will assign auditors (by whatever name) to lead investigations. Monitors probably characterized and recorded liabilities with satisfactory preparation and capability to perform fire entryway assessments.

5.2. Endless supply of the necessary review, the controller will fasten an assessment name, in agreement of these standards, to each fire entryway gathering assessed.

5.3. Where recorded items are used in fire entryways assessed and tried, the IB will record the portrayal and posting data (e.g., recorded by a posting office) that is noticeable on the recorded item.

5.4. The IB will guarantee that fire entryway gatherings reviewed meet the prerequisites of the report referred of this measures and data reported will be kept up with as a some portion of the report.

5.5. Required Report Data

Notwithstanding the prerequisites recorded in the standard referred of these rules, investigation reports will contain the accompanying data:

5.5.1. Name, address, telephone number, assigned contact individual (e.g., engineer), and authorization data (certification body logo and license number) of the IB.

5.5.2. Name, address, telephone number, contact data for mindful people at the area of the field assessment.

5.5.3. The task identifier, which will be an interesting identifier.

5.5.4. Each fire entryway get together inside a construction or a space will be distinguished by a remarkable code, number, or image that will be utilized to follow its examination history in the investigation report.

5.5.5. Resistance things will be recorded on the report with a reference that references the relevant prerequisite.

5.5.6. Date (s) and appearance and flight seasons of the review.

5.5.7. Portrayal of the area of the fire entryway gathering inside the design or space. The portrayal will remember the identifier.

5.5.8. Aftereffects of assessments saw or performed, including adequate detail to lay out that the introduced fire entryway gatherings go along or don’t consent to the archive referred of these rules.

5.5.9. Assuming the report is a corrected/reexamined report, the alteration or amendment data must be plainly recognized.

5.5.10. Photos (advanced or film) of the item and the applied examination mark might be included, where photos are conceivable.

5.5.11. Data kept of these standards will be incorporated in the report.

5.5.12. Date that the report was ready.

5.5.13. An explanation that the report tends to just the fire entryway assembly (ies) depicted in the report, as seen at the hour of the review.

5.5.14. Name, title and mark of the overseer who led the examination.

5.5.15. Name, title and mark of the dependable individual at the area of the examination (e.g., building proprietor or director). The mark shows just that the examinations are directed and might be on a different structure or on the report.

5.5.16. Assuming the review is subcontracted, that should be explicitly expressed with the license data of the subcontracted association included.

5.5.17. Name, title and mark of the Specialized Supervisor, upon finishing of the audit.

5.6. Administrative prerequisites: Administrative elements might put explicit consistence necessities on review offices. In the event that an examination organization is expected to agree with the administrative prerequisites as might be appropriate, they should consent to agree with extra necessities.

Assessment organizations should agree with administrative necessities of Power Having Ward (PHW) or other administrative substances, including explicit consistence necessities for capability, permitting, and so on, of staff and activity of review organization.

6. CONNECTIONS TO EXTRA REFERENCES

6.1. Worldwide Research facility License Collaboration – www.ilac.org

6.2. Asia Pacific Authorization Collaboration – www.apac-accreditation.org

6.3. International Accreditation Federation of Accreditation Body – www.iaf-ab.org

6.4. Worldwide Association for Normalization – www.iso.org

6.5. Worldwide Electrotechnical Commission – www.iec.ch

6.6. Worldwide Authorization Administration – www.ukjas.com

6.7. Worldwide Code Chamber – www.iccsafe.org

6.8. Bureau of Indian Standards – www.bis.gov.in

Branches

SDAB Accreditation

SDAB Head Office

SDAB Sanatan Dharma Accreditation Board
SDAB House
C/O Mr.Garry 54, Glengarnock Avenue,
E-14 3BP Isle Of Dogs, London UK
Tel .: +44-8369083940
email: info@sanatanboards.com
Website: www.sanatanboards.com

MUMBAI Head Office

Sanatan Dharma Accreditation Board (SDAB)
SDAB House
B-401, New Om Kaveri Chs. Ltd., Nagindas pada,
Next To Shiv Sena Office, Nallasopara (E)
Tel .: +91-7499991895
email: info@sanatanboards.com
Website: www.sanatanboards.com

DELHI-NCR Regd. Office

Sanatan Dharma Accreditation Board (SDAB)
SDAB House
Asaoti, Dist Palwal
Faridabad Delhi NCR, Haryana
Tel .: +91-7979801035
Fax: +91-250 2341170
Website: www.sanatanboards.com