Laboratory and Test House Accreditation

Guide and Outline Strategy for Test and Calibration or Clinical Research Centre Authorization

SDAB certification includes an independent review of documented plans to ensure that laboratory management operates in accordance with defined training and competence standards.

The SDAB approach is designed to ensure that its licensing activities are conducted in an open, transparent, fair, and technically competent manner. The system is intended to be dependable, repeatable, responsive, and authoritative for ease of use by stakeholders.

To ensure that the needs and prerequisites of laboratory partners are met, SDAB operates within a documented quality management framework. The organization supports the establishment of quality objectives and the implementation of effective quality practices. This ensures that all competent personnel are fully aware of quality arrangements, customer confidence is maintained, and that staff welfare, safety, and regulatory support are prioritized. Visitors to facilities are treated with due respect, and appropriate consideration is given to their wellbeing while on site.

SDAB promotes the maintenance of technical competence and emphasizes best professional practices. It also supports environmental responsibility by encouraging the use of recyclable and renewable materials and by minimizing waste generation and energy consumption.

SDAB recognizes the importance of relevant guidelines for all stakeholders within its scope of operations and therefore aligns its activities with ISO/IEC 17011:2017.

The SDAB fee structure is based on reasonable moderation for research facilities. Fees are calculated to recover the costs of accreditation activities, taking into account factors such as the turnover of the research facility or, in the case of non-commercial or government laboratories, the number of tests performed.

Charges depend on the initial accreditation and ongoing surveillance activities. Guide 52 provides a detailed explanation of the fee structure.

Accreditation Process

Applicants shall submit a formal application for accreditation. Test laboratories or clinical research facilities are required to use the prescribed application format.
Upon review of the application and preliminary correspondence, and if suitability is confirmed, an invoice for the application fee will be issued as specified.
The applicant test, calibration, or clinical research centre is required to comply with ISO/IEC 17025 or ISO 15189, as applicable, and to maintain a Quality Management System aligned with ISO 9001:2015.
SDAB will review the application, may request additional information, and, if the application and preliminary assessment confirm suitability, an invoice for the assessment fee will be issued.
Complete documentation, including manuals, systems, and organizational structures, shall be submitted as required by SDAB.
SDAB will issue key documents to the applicant for agreement upon successful evaluation. These include:
- Agreement
- Memorandum of Understanding
- Licence imprints and logos
- Agreements
- Set of principles
- Worldwide affiliations
- Authority
- Rules for use of imprints
Accreditation and Surveillance Process (Continued)
1. The candidate shall submit to SDAB all documentation related to the activities of the test and calibration or clinical research center.
2. SDAB will review and assess the submitted documentation. If necessary, SDAB may require the candidate to make revisions and submit responses before proceeding to the next stage.
3. Upon a positive licensing decision, SDAB will issue an agreement. Test agreements may also be issued prior to application upon request.
4. SDAB will grant a temporary license once the documented management system is found to be satisfactory. The candidate will be listed on the SDAB website as a “Temporary Body.”
5. The candidate shall conduct test or calibration activities. Copies of verified or electronic records related to these activities shall be submitted to SDAB as required, consistent with previously reviewed reports.
6. Where necessary, SDAB will conduct on-site observations of the candidate’s testing or calibration activities. The candidate shall bear the cost of assessor day rates, in addition to travel and related expenses.
7. Following a successful on-site assessment, the candidate’s license will be upgraded to Full Accreditation. The candidate will be listed on the SDAB website, including any applicable conditions.
8. The candidate may continue testing and calibration or clinical research activities without the need to submit further desk-based documentation unless specifically requested.
9. SDAB will monitor the scope and level of testing, calibration, or clinical laboratory activities and conduct certification audits as appropriate.
10. SDAB will arrange for the listing of the accredited test and calibration or clinical laboratory in the Global Register.
NOTE
It is essential that the candidate’s clients clearly understand the relationship between SDAB and public regulatory authorities. Candidates must not imply or suggest that SDAB activities are carried out on behalf of, or with the endorsement of, public authorities. For this reason, the Terms and Conditions are critically important. SDAB guidance documents are publicly available, and candidates are encouraged to provide these to their clients prior to commencing work.
SDAB assessment activities are proportionate to the level of risk involved. Increased laboratory activity or higher operational complexity may require greater levels of assessment and surveillance. Research centers are therefore required to inform SDAB of changes in workload, income, or testing activity to ensure that appropriate certification and surveillance arrangements are maintained.
Where SDAB appoints an Assessor for a specific geographical region or country, the term “SDAB” used in this guide shall be understood to refer to the appointed Assessor.

Strategy for Authorization of Test, Calibration, and Clinical Research Centres

Document Control:
Version: 2.0
Date: October 26, 2023
Authorized by: SDAB Accreditation Board
Applicability: All prospective and current accreditation holders.

Executive Summary & Introduction to Accreditation
Philosophy and Principles of the SDAB Accreditation System
- Core Values: Openness, Transparency, Fairness, Technical Competence
- The SDAB Quality Management Framework
- Alignment with International Standards: ISO/IEC 17011:2017
Strategic Benefits of SDAB Accreditation
- For Laboratories and Research Centres
- For Clients and End-Users
- For Regulators and the Public
- Promotion of Professional Best Practice and Environmental Responsibility
Scope and Applicability of SDAB Accreditation
- Test Laboratories (ISO/IEC 17025)
- Calibration Laboratories (ISO/IEC 17025)
- Clinical Research & Medical Testing Laboratories (ISO 15189)
- Integration with Quality Management Systems (ISO 9001:2015)
Detailed Fee Structure and Financial Principles
- Philosophy of Reasonable Moderation
- Cost-Recovery Model
- Initial Accreditation vs. Surveillance Fees
- Factors Influencing Fees: Turnover, Test Volume, Complexity
- Reference to Guide 52
The Accreditation Process: A Step-by-Step Guide
- Phase 1: Application & Preliminary Review
- Phase 2: Documentation Assessment & Desk Review
- Phase 3: On-Site Assessment & Witnessing
- Phase 4: Evaluation, Decision & Granting of Accreditation
- Phase 5: Surveillance, Reassessment & Ongoing Compliance
Key Documentation and Agreements
- The Accreditation Agreement
- Memorandum of Understanding (MoU)
- Licence Imprints, Logos, and Rules for Use
- Principles of Operation and Worldwide Affiliations
Roles and Responsibilities
- Responsibilities of the Applicant/Accredited Body
- Responsibilities of SDAB and its Appointed Assessors
- Clarifying the Relationship with Public Regulatory Authorities
Maintaining Accreditation: Surveillance, Changes, and Expansion
- Annual Surveillance Activities
- Handling Significant Changes (Scope, Management, Location)
- Risk-Proportional Assessment Strategies
- Recertification Audits
Appeals, Complaints, and Dispute Resolution
Glossary of Terms
Appendices
- Appendix A: Sample Application Form
- Appendix B: Checklist for Required Documentation
- Appendix C: Assessor Code of Conduct
- Appendix D: Link to Publicly Available Guidance Documents

1. Executive Summary & Introduction to Accreditation

In today’s globalized economy and scientific landscape, the demand for reliable, comparable, and trustworthy data is paramount. Whether it is ensuring the safety of a medical device, validating the environmental impact of a new material, or confirming the calibration of equipment used in critical infrastructure, confidence in testing and calibration results is non-negotiable. Accreditation, as provided by the SDAB (Standards and Development Accreditation Board), serves as the independent, authoritative seal of confidence that a laboratory or research centre operates competently and generates technically valid results.

This comprehensive guide outlines the complete strategy, process, and requirements for obtaining and maintaining SDAB accreditation for test laboratories, calibration laboratories, and clinical research centres. It is designed to be a transparent roadmap for applicants, detailing every stage from initial inquiry through to successful accreditation and ongoing surveillance. The SDAB system is built on internationally recognized standards and principles, ensuring that its accreditations are respected globally, thereby facilitating cross-border acceptance of test reports and calibration certificates, reducing technical barriers to trade, and enhancing public trust in scientific and clinical data.

At its core, SDAB accreditation is not merely a certificate on the wall; it is a rigorous, peer-reviewed assessment of a laboratory’s technical competence, impartiality, and consistent operational integrity. It verifies that the laboratory has qualified personnel, validated methods, appropriate equipment, traceable measurements, and a robust quality management system to ensure the reliability of its outputs. This document demystifies the process, setting clear expectations and fostering a collaborative partnership between SDAB and the scientific community in pursuit of excellence.

2. Philosophy and Principles of the SDAB Accreditation System

The effectiveness and credibility of an accreditation body hinge on the principles that underpin its operations. SDAB has established a foundational philosophy designed to ensure its services are of the highest integrity and utility to all stakeholders.

2.1 Core Values: Openness, Transparency, Fairness, and Technical Competence

Openness: SDAB’s policies, criteria, and processes are documented and publicly accessible. There are no hidden requirements, and all laboratories meeting the criteria are eligible to apply, irrespective of their size or affiliation.
Transparency: The decision-making process is clear. Laboratories receive detailed reports from assessments, understand the reasons for any findings, and are informed of the status of their application at each stage. Fee structures are clearly defined in Guide 52.
Fairness: All applicants and accredited bodies are treated equitably. Assessments are conducted objectively against the agreed-upon standards (ISO/IEC 17025, ISO 15189), not subjective opinion. The appeals process safeguards against perceived unfairness.
Technical Competence: SDAB itself operates to the highest international standard for accreditation bodies, ISO/IEC 17011:2017. Its assessors are technical experts in their respective fields, ensuring evaluations are performed by peers who understand the specific challenges and best practices of the discipline being assessed.

2.2 The SDAB Quality Management Framework
SDAB “practices what it preaches” by operating within a rigorous documented Quality Management System (QMS). This framework ensures the consistency and reliability of its own accreditation services. It includes:

Documented Procedures: For every activity, from application review to complaint handling.
Competence Management: Rigorous processes for the selection, training, authorization, and monitoring of its assessment staff and technical experts.
Impartiality Management: Robust policies and structures to identify, analyze, mitigate, and document any potential conflicts of interest, ensuring all accreditation decisions are made without commercial, financial, or other undue pressures.
Continuous Improvement: Regular internal audits, management reviews, and feedback mechanisms to drive ongoing enhancement of the accreditation system.

2.3 Alignment with International Standards: ISO/IEC 17011:2017
ISO/IEC 17011:2017 is the international standard specifying requirements for the competence, consistent operation, and impartiality of accreditation bodies. By aligning its operations with this standard, SDAB ensures its accreditations are:

Internationally Recognized: Facilitating the global acceptance of test data.
Consistent: Assessments follow the same rigorous protocol for all laboratories.
Authoritative: Rooted in globally agreed-upon best practices for conformity assessment.

This alignment is a critical component of SDAB’s commitment to being a dependable, repeatable, and authoritative organization.

3. Strategic Benefits of SDAB Accreditation

Accreditation is a strategic investment that yields significant returns for the laboratory, its clients, and society at large.

3.1 For Laboratories and Research Centres

Enhanced Credibility and Market Differentiation: SDAB accreditation is a powerful marketing tool, demonstrating independent verification of competence that can set a laboratory apart from competitors.
Improved Internal Processes: The journey to accreditation forces a critical review and streamlining of all operations—from sample management and method validation to personnel training and record-keeping—leading to greater efficiency, reduced errors, and cost savings.
Access to New Markets: Many tenders, especially in government procurement, regulated sectors (e.g., construction, healthcare, energy), and international trade, formally require or prefer accredited test results. Accreditation opens these doors.
Increased Client Confidence and Retention: Clients are assured of the quality and reliability of data, fostering long-term partnerships and reducing the need for retesting.
Focus on Staff Competence and Welfare: The accreditation standards mandate systematic attention to training, competence assessment, and creating a responsible working environment, boosting staff morale and professionalism.

3.2 For Clients and End-Users

Assured Data Reliability: Clients can specify SDAB accreditation with confidence, knowing the laboratory has been independently assessed as competent.
Risk Mitigation: Using an accredited laboratory reduces the risk of incorrect data leading to product failure, safety issues, or non-compliance with regulations.
Global Acceptance: An SDAB-accredited test report or calibration certificate is more likely to be accepted by authorities and clients in other countries, avoiding costly duplicate testing.

3.3 For Regulators and the Public

A Reliable Partner in Regulation: Accreditation provides regulators with a robust mechanism to underpin legislation. They can reference accreditation in regulations, relying on SDAB’s technical assessment to ensure laboratories meet required standards.
Public Trust and Safety: In areas like clinical diagnostics, environmental monitoring, and food safety, accreditation supports public confidence that the results upon which health and safety decisions are made are trustworthy.

3.4 Promotion of Professional Best Practice and Environmental Responsibility
SDAB embeds broader societal values into its system:

Professional Best Practice: It encourages laboratories to go beyond minimum standards, fostering a culture of continuous technical improvement and ethical conduct.
Environmental Responsibility: SDAB actively promotes sustainable operations by encouraging the use of recyclable/renewable materials, minimization of waste, and reduction of energy consumption within accredited facilities.

4. Scope and Applicability of SDAB Accreditation

SDAB accreditation is tailored to different types of laboratories, each assessed against the most relevant international standard.

4.1 Test Laboratories (ISO/IEC 17025:2017)
The primary standard for testing and calibration laboratories. Accreditation to ISO/IEC 17025 demonstrates a laboratory’s competence to carry out specific tests using defined methods. It covers:

All technical aspects: personnel, facilities, equipment, method validation, measurement uncertainty, reporting.
Management system requirements: ensuring consistent quality and client focus.

4.2 Calibration Laboratories (ISO/IEC 17025:2017)
The same standard applies, with a focus on establishing metrological traceability to the International System of Units (SI) through an unbroken chain of calibrations. This is critical for ensuring measurements made in testing, manufacturing, and trade are accurate and comparable worldwide.

4.3 Clinical Research & Medical Testing Laboratories (ISO 15189:2022)
This standard is specific to medical laboratories and includes principles of ISO/IEC 17025 but adds requirements crucial to the clinical context, such as:

Pre-examination, examination, and post-examination processes.
Laboratory information management.
Ethical considerations and patient confidentiality.
Consultation with clinical users.

4.4 Integration with Quality Management Systems (ISO 9001:2015)
While ISO/IEC 17025 and ISO 15189 incorporate quality management principles, laboratories are encouraged to align their QMS with ISO 9001:2015. This provides a robust framework for overall business excellence, with the technical requirements of the laboratory standards integrated seamlessly. SDAB’s assessment will verify that the laboratory’s QMS effectively supports its technical competence.

5. Detailed Fee Structure and Financial Principles

SDAB operates on a non-profit, cost-recovery basis. The fee structure is designed to be reasonable and transparent, ensuring the sustainability of the accreditation system without creating undue financial barriers.

5.1 Philosophy of Reasonable Moderation
Fees are set with consideration for the diverse financial situations of research facilities, from large commercial entities to non-profit institutes and government labs.

5.2 Cost-Recovery Model
Fees are calculated to recover the direct and indirect costs associated with accreditation activities. These costs include:

Administrative processing of applications.
Assessor time for document review, on-site assessments, report writing, and technical evaluation.
Management, oversight, and maintenance of the accreditation system.
Development of guidance documents and participation in international forums to maintain recognition.

5.3 Initial Accreditation vs. Surveillance Fees

Initial Accreditation Fee: Covers the comprehensive process of first-time assessment, including application review, document evaluation, on-site visit(s), and the decision-making process. An application fee is typically invoiced first, followed by an assessment fee once suitability is confirmed.
Annual Surveillance Fee: Covers ongoing activities to maintain accreditation, including annual documentary reviews, surveillance visits (often shorter than initial assessments), and administration. This is typically a recurring fee.

5.4 Factors Influencing Fees
Fees are not one-size-fits-all. They are proportional and consider:

Complexity and Scope: A laboratory performing 200 different tests across multiple disciplines will incur higher assessment costs than one performing 5 similar tests.
Turnover/Test Volume: For commercial labs, turnover can be a proxy for scale. For government/non-profit labs, the annual number of tests or calibrations is a key metric.
Risk Level: Activities with higher inherent risk (e.g., clinical toxicology, structural testing) may require more in-depth assessment.
Location: Travel and subsistence costs for assessors are borne by the applicant and are in addition to the professional day rate for the assessor’s time.

5.5 Reference to Guide 52
SDAB publishes a separate, detailed document, Guide 52: Schedule of Fees, which provides the current fee rates, calculation formulas, and invoicing schedules. All applicants must consult this guide for precise financial planning.

6. The Accreditation Process: A Step-by-Step Guide

The journey to accreditation is a structured partnership between the laboratory and SDAB. The following phases detail the complete process.

PHASE 1: Application & Preliminary Review

Initial Inquiry: The laboratory contacts SDAB expressing interest. SDAB provides information packs, this guide, and Guide 52.
Formal Application: The laboratory submits a formal application using the SDAB-prescribed format (see Appendix A). This includes basic details about the organization, desired scope of accreditation, and a declaration of readiness.
Preliminary Correspondence & Invoice for Application Fee: SDAB reviews the application for completeness and clarity. If suitable, an invoice for the non-refundable application fee is issued. Payment of this fee formalizes the application and initiates the process.

PHASE 2: Documentation Assessment & Desk Review
4. Submission of Management System Documentation: The laboratory submits its complete Quality Manual, procedures, records, and other documentation demonstrating compliance with ISO/IEC 17025 or ISO 15189. A checklist is provided (Appendix B).
5. Document Review: An SDAB lead assessor, often with a relevant technical expert, conducts a thorough desk review of the submitted documentation. The objective is to evaluate the planned system for conformity with the standard.
6. Document Review Report & Corrective Actions: A report is issued detailing any gaps, non-conformities, or requests for clarification. The laboratory must address these and provide evidence of corrective action.
7. Invoice for Assessment Fee: Upon satisfactory resolution of the document review stage, an invoice for the assessment fee (covering the on-site visit) is issued.

PHASE 3: On-Site Assessment & Witnessing
8. Planning the On-Site Visit: SDAB and the laboratory agree on dates, the assessment team (Lead Assessor, Technical Assessor(s)), and a detailed agenda.
9. Opening Meeting: The assessment begins with a meeting involving laboratory management and key staff to confirm the plan, scope, and methods of communication.
10. On-Site Activities:
* Interviews: With management, quality manager, technical staff, and authorized signatories.
* Facility & Equipment Tour: Inspection of environmental conditions, equipment calibration status, and maintenance records.
* Record Review: Examination of internal audits, management reviews, training records, method validation data, and sample reports/calibration certificates.
* Witnessing of Testing/Calibration: Assessors observe staff performing routine and critical tests/calibrations within the requested scope to evaluate practical competence, following of procedures, and data recording.
* Closing Meeting: The assessment team presents a summary of findings, including any identified non-conformities (major or minor). The laboratory has the opportunity to clarify facts.

PHASE 4: Evaluation, Decision & Granting of Accreditation
11. Assessment Report & Corrective Actions: A formal detailed report is sent to the laboratory. The laboratory must submit a root cause analysis and corrective action plan for any non-conformities within a specified timeframe.
12. Corrective Action Review: SDAB reviews the submitted corrective actions for adequacy. For major non-conformities, evidence of implementation may be required, potentially via a follow-up visit (which may incur additional cost).
13. Accreditation Decision: The complete file, including the report and corrective actions, is reviewed by an independent SDAB decision-making committee (e.g., Technical Council) to ensure impartiality.
14. Granting of Accreditation:
* Temporary License: In some cases, upon a positive initial decision and satisfactory documentation, a temporary license may be granted. The laboratory is listed on the SDAB website as a “Temporary Body” and may begin issuing reports under accreditation, often subject to a successful first surveillance visit.
* Full Accreditation: Following successful closure of all non-conformities and final committee approval, Full Accreditation is granted. The laboratory receives a formal Accreditation Certificate, a scope of accreditation document listing approved tests/calibrations, and the SDAB accreditation logo/imprint.
* Public Listing: The laboratory’s name, contact details, and scope of accreditation are published on the SDAB publicly accessible online register.

PHASE 5: Surveillance, Reassessment & Ongoing Compliance
15. Annual Surveillance: Accreditation is maintained through ongoing supervision. Each year, SDAB conducts surveillance activities, which typically include:
* An annual documentary review (submission of key records like internal audit reports, management review minutes, proficiency testing results).
* A periodic on-site surveillance visit (usually shorter and more focused than the initial assessment), conducted at least once during the accreditation cycle.
16. Reassessment: Full reassessment occurs every 2-4 years (the cycle is defined by SDAB based on risk), repeating much of the initial assessment process to confirm continued compliance and competence.
17. Handling Changes: The laboratory must notify SDAB in advance of any significant changes (e.g., new location, change in legal entity, new major test methods, change in key personnel). SDAB will determine if an additional assessment is needed.
18. Global Register: SDAB will arrange for the listing of the accredited body in relevant international registers (e.g., Global Laboratory Accreditation GAD – Global Accreditation Directory), enhancing global recognition.

7. Key Documentation and Agreements

Upon successful accreditation, the laboratory enters into a formal relationship with SDAB, governed by several key documents:

Accreditation Agreement: The core legal contract defining the rights and obligations of both parties, the term of accreditation, financial terms, and conditions for suspension or withdrawal.
Memorandum of Understanding (MoU): May outline specific operational understandings or commitments related to the scope.
Licence Imprints and Logos: SDAB provides digital artwork and strict Rules for Use. The accreditation logo and specific endorsement (e.g., “Accredited for Testing”) may only be used on reports and certificates for tests within the accredited scope. Misuse is a serious violation.
Set of Principles: A document outlining the ethical and operational principles that underpin the accreditation.
Worldwide Affiliations: Information on SDAB’s membership in international bodies like Global Laboratory Accreditation and International Body, which facilitate the global acceptance of its accreditations.

8. Roles and Responsibilities

8.1 Responsibilities of the Applicant/Accredited Body

To understand and comply fully with the requirements of the relevant standard (ISO/IEC 17025, ISO 15189) and SDAB’s requirements.
To submit complete, truthful, and timely information and documentation.
To provide access to all areas, personnel, and records during assessments.
To bear all costs associated with the accreditation process (fees, assessor travel).
To use the accreditation symbols and claims only as authorized.
CRITICALLY: To ensure its clients understand that SDAB is an independent accreditation body, not a public regulatory authority. The laboratory must not imply SDAB acts on behalf of the government. The provided Terms and Conditions document should be shared with clients to clarify this relationship.

8.2 Responsibilities of SDAB and its Appointed Assessors

To conduct all activities impartially, competently, and confidentially.
To provide clear communication, documentation, and reports.
To make consistent, evidence-based decisions.
To manage appeals and complaints fairly.
To maintain the integrity and international recognition of the SDAB accreditation brand.
Appointed Assessors: When SDAB appoints a regional/country assessor, the term “SDAB” in this guide refers to that authorized representative acting on SDAB’s behalf.

9. Maintaining Accreditation: Surveillance, Changes, and Expansion

Accreditation is a commitment to continuous compliance. SDAB employs a risk-proportional approach to surveillance. Laboratories with higher complexity, a history of non-conformities, or involved in high-risk testing will be subject to more intensive oversight. Laboratories must proactively inform SDAB of significant increases in workload, income, or testing activity, as this may trigger a review of the surveillance plan.

10. Appeals, Complaints, and Dispute Resolution

SDAB has formal, documented processes for:

Appeals: By laboratories against SDAB decisions (e.g., denial of accreditation, scope reduction).
Complaints: By any party (e.g., a client of an accredited lab, or a lab about an assessor’s conduct).
These processes ensure fairness and are handled by personnel not involved in the original matter.

11. Glossary of Terms

Accreditation: Third-party attestation related to a conformity assessment body conveying formal demonstration of its competence, impartiality, and consistent operation.
Scope of Accreditation: Specific tests, calibrations, or types of inspections for which a laboratory is accredited.
Non-conformity: A deviation from a requirement of the standard or SDAB’s criteria.
Surveillance: Ongoing activities to monitor the continued compliance of an accredited body.
Global Laboratory Accreditation: International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation.
Proficiency Testing (PT): Inter-laboratory comparisons to monitor a lab’s ongoing performance.

12. Appendices

(Note: Sample content indicated)

Appendix A: Sample Application Form
[Form would request: Legal name, address, contact details, desired standard (17025/15189), description of desired scope, number of personnel, management system standard (e.g., ISO 9001), declaration of commitment.]

Appendix B: Checklist for Required Documentation

Quality Manual
Organizational chart
Procedure documents list
List of authorized signatories
Equipment list with calibration status
Scope of requested accreditation (draft)
Internal audit and management review records
Method validation summaries for key tests

Appendix C: Assessor Code of Conduct

Act with integrity and impartiality.
Maintain confidentiality.
Declare any conflicts of interest.
Perform assessments based on objective evidence.

Appendix D: Link to Publicly Available Guidance Documents

SDAB G01: Guide to ISO/IEC 17025 Application
SDAB G52: Schedule of Fees
SDAB R01: Rules for Use of the Accreditation Symbol

Branches

SDAB Accreditation

SDAB Head Office

SDAB Sanatan Dharma Accreditation Board
SDAB House
C/O Mr.Garry 54, Glengarnock Avenue,
E-14 3BP Isle Of Dogs, London UK
Tel .: +44-8369083940
email: info@sanatanboards.com
Website: www.sanatanboards.com

MUMBAI Head Office

Sanatan Dharma Accreditation Board (SDAB)
SDAB House
B-401, New Om Kaveri Chs. Ltd., Nagindas pada,
Next To Shiv Sena Office, Nallasopara (E)
Tel .: +91-7499991895
email: info@sanatanboards.com
Website: www.sanatanboards.com

DELHI-NCR Regd. Office

Sanatan Dharma Accreditation Board (SDAB)
SDAB House
Asaoti, Dist Palwal
Faridabad Delhi NCR, Haryana
Tel .: +91-7979801035
Fax: +91-250 2341170
Website: www.sanatanboards.com

sanatanboards