Assessor Code Of Conduct

Set Of Principles For Evaluator And Surveying Faculty

FOREWORD

The privileges and guidelines set out in this record are intended to be a focal piece of an examiner’s conduct. No qualification is made in this report among ‘examiner’ and ‘assessor’. This record is intended to further develop the examiner’s administration the business local area.

Inspectors will be immovably dedicated to working on their administration. This implies a help that:

continuously puts the client first, offering types of assistance that satisfy obviously characterized guidelines or agreement conditions, in manners receptive to business perspectives and requirements.
produce clear, quantifiable advantages to business, with accentuation on the advancement of good practice as opposed to the aversion of poor.
is exceptionally proficient, addressing great incentive for cash, accomplished through great administration.
regards and values the abilities and information on clients.

How This Influences Clients

This report sets out clear client privileges of administration in the release of agreements.

The Client’s Privileges

To get an expert degree of care based on business needs and wants.
To be given itemized data on quality administrations, including quality guidelines, project timescales furthermore, costs.
To get exhortation whenever through the examiner or its manager whenever contracted to supply it.
To be relegated a superb resource, OK to the client, and to be doled out a subsequent individual on the off chance that this is helpful for the client.
To be ensured arrangements for visits on a particular date and time.
To be given a reasonable clarification of any proposed administration, including predictable dangers and practical choices, before the client chooses to make a move.
To have any objection about the inspector’s administrations examined and to get a full and brief composed answer from the Inspector or from SDAB.
To approach the inspector’s records, and to realize that those working for the evaluator are under a obligation of care to keep the records private.
To pick whether he wishes to partake in specialized exploration or preparing.
To be served by an individual who will notice completely the prerequisites of this Set of principles.

Client Norms

There are eight guidelines for examiners:

Suggestions will be feasible. Client organizations ought not be suggested activities or arrangements past capacity to execute.
Fruition of Tasks. Before the undertaking ends a choice ought to be made about any proceeding relationship with the reviewer or different necessities the client might have. The pertinent contact will concur plans for addressing these necessities.
A named qualified individual liable for every client. The inspector ought to give a named, qualified individual who will be liable for the client business project.
Arrangement times. The evaluator will concur a particular arrangement time and meet around then.
Retraction of gatherings. The evaluator won’t drop upon the arrival of the gathering.
Sitting tight time for administration. At the point when clients call the inspector’s workplaces, specialized help ought to be given inside a predefined time.
Plans to guarantee clients, incorporating those utilizing individuals with exceptional requirements, can utilize administrations. Inspectors will guarantee that the representatives of the client can utilize the administrations they organize.
Regard for protection, respect and strict and social convictions. Inspectors will make arrangement so that appropriate individual thought is shown, for instance by guaranteeing that security, pride and strict also, social convictions are regarded.

Set of rules

Evaluators will act in a reliable and impartial way comparable to clients, and any organizations associated with administration by them.
Examiners will not acknowledge installment, gift, commission, markdown or will they benefit in any capacity from organizations adjusted, from their agents, or other intrigued individual.
Examiners will uncover to their clients any applicable connections they might have with other associations prior to undertaking any work.
Evaluators will not unveil the discoveries, or any piece of them or some other data acquired in the course of administration to any outsider, except if approved recorded as a hard copy by the client.
Reviewers will not act at all biased to the standing or the interest of clients or of organizations adjusted for their sake.
Examiners will, in case of any supposed break of this code, co-work completely in any proper enquiry technique worked by SDAB, the client, or by a commonly selected proficient body.
Inspectors will follow their own procedural documentation.

Execution And Progress, Guidance For Clients.

Inspecting and Accreditation and Consultancy will, not all alone, accomplish anything for client organizations. Clients meet their objectives themselves yet with reviewer help. An inspector isn’t regularly anticipated to give consultancy or answers for issues they might have recognized during a review. A reviewer is supposed to work as per a laid out inspecting standard e.g. ISO 19011.

Dispensing an amount of cash to an inspecting project isn’t sufficient. Clients need to designate time too to get ready for and answer it. Frequently what clients need isn’t dependably what they need. Clients ought to in this manner search for a change as the most substantial consequence of expert administrations.

Clients ought to anticipate:

Review plans
Clear discoveries in view of characterized models
Opportune reports
Politeness
Compassion, not compassion
Firm course
Compelling venture the board

Criticism

Clients ought to be urged to give their perspectives to empower SDAB to foster these norms further.

A Comprehensive Set of Principles for Evaluator and Surveying Faculty

FOREWORD

The privileges, responsibilities, and guidelines set out in this document constitute the foundational framework for professional conduct and ethical practice for all individuals undertaking assessment, evaluation, and surveying duties. This code is an integral and focal component of an assessor’s professional identity, governing interactions with clients, colleagues, and the public. Within this document, no distinction is made between the terms ‘examiner’, ‘evaluator’, ‘surveyor’, and ‘assessor’; all are encompassed under the professional title of Assessor. This Code of Conduct is designed to elevate the profession, enhance the quality of service delivered to the business community, and foster an environment of trust, integrity, and continuous improvement.

Assessors shall be unwaveringly committed to the pursuit of excellence in their service delivery. This commitment manifests as a service philosophy that:

Prioritizes the Client: Continuously places the client’s legitimate needs and interests at the forefront, delivering services that meet or exceed clearly defined standards, specifications, and contractual conditions. Service delivery must be responsive to business contexts, operational constraints, and strategic objectives.
Delivers Tangible Value: Produces clear, measurable, and beneficial outcomes for the client’s business. The emphasis is proactively on the promotion and implementation of good practice, innovation, and robustness, rather than merely the identification and avoidance of deficiencies.
Upholds Professionalism: Is executed with the highest degree of professional competence, rigor, and ethical consideration. It represents excellent value for money, achieved through efficient project management, sound methodology, and clear communication.
Respects Client Expertise: Respects and values the intrinsic skills, knowledge, and experience possessed by clients and their personnel. The assessor-client relationship is a collaborative partnership aimed at achieving shared goals.

The Impact on Clients: A Covenant of Service

This document establishes a clear covenant of service, articulating the fundamental rights clients can expect when engaging an assessor. It transforms principles into actionable commitments, ensuring the relationship is built on transparency, accountability, and mutual respect.

The Client’s Rights

Clients engaging a certified assessor have the right:

To Professional Care: To receive a professional standard of care and diligence that is grounded in a thorough understanding of their specific business needs, objectives, and risk profile.
To Transparent Information: To be provided with detailed, unambiguous, and accessible information regarding all proposed services. This includes explicit quality standards (e.g., compliance with ISO 19011), detailed project timelines, a full breakdown of costs and fees, and the methodology to be employed.
To Ongoing Advice: To receive timely and authoritative advice throughout the engagement period, as stipulated in the contract, from either the assigned assessor or a nominated manager within the assessor’s organization.
To Qualified Personnel: To be assigned a competent, qualified, and client-acceptable lead assessor responsible for their project. Furthermore, to have a suitably qualified deputy or secondary point of contact identified if this benefits the project’s continuity and effectiveness.
To Scheduling Certainty: To have firm arrangements for all site visits, meetings, and interviews confirmed, including a specific date and agreed-upon time window, with minimal disruption.
To Informed Consent: To receive a comprehensive, unbiased explanation of any proposed service, intervention, or recommendation. This must include a balanced appraisal of associated risks, potential impacts, and feasible alternative approaches before the client is required to make a decision or authorize action.
To a Formal Complaints Process: To have any complaint or concern regarding the assessor’s conduct or service thoroughly investigated through a formal, documented process. The client is entitled to a full, fair, and prompt written response from the assessor’s organization or from the relevant oversight body, such as the SDAB (Surveyors and Data Assessors Board).
To Confidentiality and Record Access: To know that all information shared is treated with strict confidentiality under a professional duty of care. Clients have the right to access their own project records, subject to legal and contractual provisions, with the assurance that all personnel involved are bound by this duty of confidentiality.
To Voluntary Participation: To freely choose whether or not to participate in any ancillary activities, such as technical research studies, training programs, or case studies, without any implication for the core service delivery.
To Code-Compliant Service: To be served by an assessor who adheres fully and unequivocally to all requirements outlined in this Code of Conduct.

Client Service Standards: The Eight Pillars of Delivery

To operationalize client rights, assessors and their organizations shall adhere to eight concrete service standards:

Feasibility of Recommendations: All assessments, audits, and recommendations shall be pragmatic and actionable. Client organizations must not be advised to undertake actions or implement solutions that are beyond their operational, financial, or technical capacity to execute effectively.
Project Closure and Continuity: Upon completion of an assigned project, a formal closing meeting shall be held. This meeting must address any ongoing relationship, future monitoring needs, or additional requirements the client may have. The lead assessor will agree on a clear plan for addressing these future needs or will facilitate a proper handover.
Accountability through a Named Lead: For every client project, the assessor’s organization shall provide a single, named, and appropriately qualified individual who holds ultimate responsibility for the delivery and quality of the project.
Punctuality and Scheduling Integrity: For all appointments, the assessor will agree upon and commit to a specific time. The assessor is expected to arrive at the agreed location at the appointed time, barring exceptional, unforeseen circumstances, for which immediate notice must be given.
Reliability of Appointments: An assessor will not cancel a confirmed meeting on the day it is scheduled to occur, except in cases of genuine emergency or force majeure. In such rare instances, immediate contact and rescheduling are mandatory.
Responsive Communication: When clients contact the assessor’s offices seeking technical support or clarification, such enquiries shall be addressed or escalated within a pre-defined and communicated timeframe (e.g., within one business day).
Accessibility and Inclusivity: Assessors will proactively make arrangements to ensure all client personnel, including those with disabilities, special needs, or language differences, can effectively engage with and benefit from the assessment process. This includes considering physical access, communication formats, and cultural sensitivities in planning activities.
Respect for Individual Dignity: Assessors shall conduct all interactions with the utmost respect for individual privacy, personal dignity, and religious, cultural, and social beliefs. The assessment process must be designed and implemented to avoid unnecessary intrusion, embarrassment, or discrimination.

THE CODE OF CONDUCT: CORE ETHICAL PRINCIPLES

Beyond service standards, assessors are bound by a stricter code of personal and professional ethics that governs their judgment and behavior.

Integrity and Impartiality (Objectivity): Assessors shall conduct all their activities in a fair, consistent, unbiased, and objective manner. This impartiality must extend to all clients and any third-party organizations encountered during the service delivery. Personal interests, preconceptions, or external pressures must not influence findings or judgments.
Probity and Avoidance of Conflicts of Interest: Assessors shall not solicit or accept, for themselves or others, any payment, gift, favor, commission, discount, hospitality, or any other benefit that could be perceived as influencing their independent judgment or creating an obligation. This includes benefits from clients, their suppliers, contractors, or any other interested party related to the assignment.
Transparency of Interests: Assessors have a positive duty to disclose to their clients, in writing, any actual or potential conflicts of interest prior to accepting an assignment. This includes any financial interest, close personal relationship, or current/past affiliation with organizations connected to the scope of the assessment. Failure to disclose such information is a serious breach of trust.
Confidentiality: Assessors shall maintain the strictest confidentiality regarding all findings, data, observations, and any information (commercial, technical, or personal) acquired during the course of their work. No disclosure shall be made to any third party without the prior written authorization of the client, unless there is a clear legal or statutory duty to report.
Fiduciary Duty to the Client: Assessors shall not act in any way that is detrimental to the reputation or legitimate business interests of their clients, or of the organizations being assessed on the client’s behalf. They must be mindful of the potential consequences of their words and actions.
Cooperation with Oversight: In the event of an alleged breach of this Code, assessors are obligated to cooperate fully and transparently with any formal investigation conducted by the SDAB, the client organization, or an independent professional body mutually appointed to adjudicate the matter.
Procedural Adherence: Assessors shall diligently follow their organization’s approved procedural documentation, methodologies, and work instructions, ensuring consistency and quality in service delivery. Where such procedures align with international standards (e.g., ISO/IEC 17021, ISO 19011), adherence is non-negotiable.

PERFORMANCE, PROGRESS, AND MANAGING EXPECTATIONS: GUIDANCE FOR CLIENTS

A successful assessment outcome is a shared responsibility. This section provides crucial guidance for clients to ensure they derive maximum value from the engagement.

The Nature of Assessment and Consultancy

It is vital to understand the distinct roles:

Assessment/Audit: A systematic, independent, and documented process for obtaining evidence and evaluating it objectively to determine the extent to which agreed criteria (standards, regulations, procedures) are fulfilled. The assessor’s primary role is to evaluate conformity, report findings, and verify corrective actions—not to provide solutions.
Consultancy: Involves providing advice, solutions, and direct assistance to resolve problems or implement systems. An assessor acting in a pure audit role should not provide consultancy on the same management system to a client, as this compromises objectivity (a fundamental requirement of standards like ISO 19011).

Key Clarification: An assessment, by itself, does not change an organization. It provides a snapshot and identifies gaps. Clients achieve their own goals; the assessor facilitates this through expert evaluation and feedback. Assigning a budget is insufficient; clients must also allocate time, management attention, and internal resources to prepare for the assessment, participate actively, and most importantly, to act upon the findings.

Clients should seek sustainable improvement as the most tangible return on investment. Often, the immediate “wants” of a client (e.g., a certificate with minimal fuss) may differ from their underlying “needs” (e.g., a robust, efficient system that truly adds value). A professional assessor helps illuminate this distinction.

What Clients Should Reasonably Expect from a Professional Assessor

Structured Planning: A detailed assessment plan shared in advance, outlining scope, criteria, methods, schedule, and participant requirements.
Evidence-Based Findings: Clear, factual, and unbiased findings derived from objective evidence and measured against the defined criteria. Findings should be categorized (e.g., major/minor nonconformity, observation, opportunity for improvement) to facilitate prioritization.
Timely Reporting: A comprehensive, well-structured final report delivered within the agreed timeframe, providing a clear record of the assessment and its outcomes.
Unwavering Courtesy: Professional and respectful behavior in all interactions, from the receptionist to the CEO.
Empathy, Not Sympathy: A professional understanding of the client’s challenges and constraints (empathy), without compromising on the objective evaluation of conformity (which would be unprofessional sympathy).
Firm and Fair Direction: The courage to report difficult truths when non-conformities are found, while being fair and constructive in communication.
Effective Project Management: Efficient use of time on-site, clear communication of progress, and adherence to the agreed schedule and budget.
Constructive Feedback: Oral and written feedback that is not merely critical but is designed to be understood and acted upon, highlighting root causes rather than just symptoms.

The Client’s Role in Enhancing Standards

The professional relationship is a two-way street. Clients are actively encouraged to provide candid feedback on their experience with the assessor and the assessment process. This feedback, whether positive or highlighting areas for improvement, is essential for bodies like the SDAB to refine these standards, update codes of conduct, and ensure the profession continues to meet the evolving needs of the business community. Client feedback mechanisms should be accessible, anonymous if desired, and should be seen by assessors as a vital tool for their own professional development.

EXPANDED DISCUSSION: APPLYING THE CODE IN COMPLEX SCENARIOS

(The following sections expand upon the core principles to provide practical guidance for navigating complex professional situations.)

Section 1: Navigating Conflicts of Interest in Modern Business Ecosystems

The principle of avoiding conflicts of interest is straightforward in theory but complex in practice within interconnected business environments. An assessor must be vigilant.

Scenario Analysis:

Former Employment: An assessor is assigned to audit a company where they were employed in a senior role three years prior. Action: Full written disclosure to the audit firm and the client is mandatory. The client must be given the opportunity to appoint a different assessor without prejudice.
Family Links: The assessor’s spouse works for a supplier that is critical to the client’s operation and falls within the audit scope. Action: This constitutes a clear conflict. The assessor must declare it and be removed from the assignment.
Gifts and Hospitality: A client offers tickets to a major sporting event after a successful surveillance audit. Action: Regardless of the audit’s outcome, accepting such a gift creates a perception of indebtedness. The assessor must politely decline, referencing the organization’s and the SDAB’s code of conduct. Token items of negligible value (e.g., a company pen) may be acceptable per organizational policy, but discretion is key.

Proactive Measures: Assessors should maintain an up-to-date register of interests, reviewed annually and before each major assignment. Organizations should have a clear policy defining “negligible value” and procedures for managing disclosed conflicts.

Section 2: Confidentiality in the Age of Digital Information and Remote Auditing

The duty of confidentiality is exponentially more challenging and critical with digital data transfer, cloud storage, and remote assessment techniques (e.g., virtual audits via video conferencing).

Best Practices for Digital Confidentiality:

Data Encryption: All client data, whether at rest (on laptops, USB drives) or in transit (email, file transfers), must be encrypted using industry-standard protocols.
Secure Disposal: Digital files must be permanently deleted (using file shredding software) at the end of their retention period, as defined by contract or law. Physical documents must be cross-cut shredded.
Remote Assessment Protocols: For virtual audits, assessors must use secure, password-protected platforms. They must verify the identity of remote interviewees and ensure discussions cannot be overheard in their own environment—a often-overlooked aspect of confidentiality. Recordings of sessions are strictly prohibited unless explicitly agreed upon in writing for a specific purpose (e.g., translation), with strict controls on their disposal.
Cyber Hygiene: Assessors must use strong, unique passwords, enable multi-factor authentication, and ensure all devices used for work are protected with updated anti-malware software and firewalls.

Breach Response: In the unfortunate event of a suspected data breach, the assessor’s organization must have an incident response plan that includes immediate steps to contain the breach, notification to the affected client(s) as legally required, and notification to the SDAB.

Section 3: Impartiality and Objectivity: The Cornerstone of Credibility

Impartiality is the non-negotiable foundation of the assessment profession. Without it, reports are worthless and certification becomes a commodity of no integrity.

Threats to Impartiality and Safeguards:

Threat Category	Description	Example	Potential Safeguard
Self-Interest	Arises from the assessor’s own personal or financial interests.	The audit firm is financially dependent on one major client.	Diversification of client portfolio; independent review of findings for high-dependency clients.
Self-Review	Occurs when an assessor evaluates work they were previously involved in creating.	An assessor who provided consultancy to a client on their quality system later audits that same system for certification.	Strict prohibition of consultancy and audit roles for the same client system. Structural separation within organizations.
Familiarity	Stems from long-standing or close relationships with client personnel.	The assessor has audited the same friendly client manager for 10 years.	Rotation of lead assessors at defined intervals (e.g., every 3 years); use of audit teams.
Intimidation	Results from threats, real or perceived, from the client.	A client implies they will switch to a competitor if a major nonconformity is raised.	Strong organizational backing for assessors; escalation procedures to the SDAB for undue pressure; withdrawal from the assignment if intimidation persists.
Cognitive Bias	Unconscious mental shortcuts affecting judgment.	Confirmation bias: Seeking evidence that confirms pre-existing beliefs about the client.	Use of checklists; evidence-based methodology; team auditing with discussion of findings; training on cognitive biases.

Cultivating Objectivity: Assessors must continuously practice evidence-based reasoning. Every finding must be traceable to an objective audit trail: a document, a record, or a verified statement of fact. Phrases like “it seems” or “I feel” have no place in an audit report. The language must be “The procedure X requires Y. At location Z, it was observed that Y was not performed. Record ABC confirms this.”

Section 4: Delivering Constructive Feedback and Managing Difficult Conversations

The ability to communicate difficult findings effectively is a core professional skill. The goal is to ensure the message about a deficiency is heard and acted upon, not to provoke defensiveness.

A Structured Approach for Assessors:

Prepare: Before the feedback meeting, ensure all findings are factually correct, categorized appropriately, and supported by evidence.
Contextualize: Begin feedback by acknowledging areas of strength and good practice. This establishes a balanced and fair perspective.
Describe, Don’t Accuse: Use neutral, factual language. Instead of “You failed to calibrate the equipment,” say, “The calibration records for equipment [ID] show it is overdue by two months, against the requirement of clause 4.6.”
Explain the Significance: Clarify the “so what?” factor. Link the nonconformity to a potential risk (e.g., product quality, safety, regulatory breach, cost). This helps the client prioritize.
Listen Actively: Allow the client to explain context you may have missed. They may provide additional information that changes the finding (e.g., an exemption you were unaware of).
Collaborate on Root Cause: While the assessor cannot provide consultancy, they can ask probing, open questions to help the client think through root cause: “What do you think allowed this gap to occur? Is it a training issue, a resource issue, or a process flaw?”
Agree on the Path Forward: Confirm the client understands the finding and the required action (e.g., correction, root cause analysis, corrective action). Agree on timelines for submission of evidence.

Guidance for Clients Receiving Feedback:

Listen First: Avoid the instinct to argue or explain immediately. Listen to understand the finding fully.
Seek Clarification: Ask for the specific clause of the standard and the exact evidence that led to the finding.
Provide Context: Calmly provide any relevant context or documentation the assessor may not have seen.
Focus on Resolution: Shift the conversation from “Is this a finding?” to “What do we need to do to resolve this correctly?” This is a more productive mindset.

Section 5: The Role and Authority of Oversight Bodies (e.g., SDAB)

A robust Code of Conduct requires an equally robust enforcement and development mechanism. Oversight bodies like the SDAB play several critical roles:

Standard-Setter: Developing, maintaining, and publishing this Code of Conduct and associated technical standards for the profession.
Accreditation/Certification of Assessors: Establishing the competence requirements (education, training, experience, ongoing professional development) and operating a scheme to certify that individual assessors and their employing organizations meet these requirements.
Monitoring and Surveillance: Conducting periodic reviews of certified assessors and their work, including review of audit reports, client feedback, and spot-checks on live assessments.
Disciplinary Body: Operating a fair, transparent, and independent disciplinary process to investigate alleged breaches of the Code. Sanctions can range from retraining requirements and suspension to permanent decertification. Serious cases may be referred to legal authorities.
Appeals Body: Providing an independent channel for clients or other parties to appeal against the decisions or conduct of a certified assessor.
Promoter of the Profession: Advocating for the value of professional assessment and upholding the reputation of the profession in the wider business community and with government regulators.

The relationship between the assessor and the SDAB is not optional. An assessor’s certification is contingent upon their agreement to be bound by the SDAB’s rules and to cooperate with its inquiries. This external oversight is the final guarantor of public trust in the assessment process.

Section 6: Professional Competence and Lifelong Learning

Adherence to a code is impossible without the requisite competence. Professional assessors must commit to lifelong learning.

Initial Competence: This is typically demonstrated through a combination of:

Formal Education: A relevant academic or technical qualification.
Sector-specific Experience: A defined number of years working in the relevant industry or management function.
Assessment-specific Training: Completion of accredited courses on audit principles, procedures, and techniques.
Witnessed Assessments: Successful completion of a number of assessments under the supervision of a qualified lead assessor.

Maintaining Competence: The field does not stand still. Standards change, technologies evolve, and new business risks emerge. Therefore, assessors must:

Engage in Continuous Professional Development (CPD): Fulfill a mandated minimum number of CPD hours annually. This should include technical updates (changes to standards like ISO 9001:2015), soft skills training (communication, conflict resolution), and sector-specific developments.
Undergo Regular Re-evaluation: Their performance and CPD records should be reviewed by their employer and the SDAB at regular intervals (e.g., every 3 years) as part of re-certification.
Stay Current with Legislation: Be aware of changes in relevant national and international legislation that affect their area of assessment (e.g., data protection laws like GDPR, environmental regulations, health and safety statutes).

Organizational Responsibility: Assessment firms have a duty to create an environment that supports competence. This includes providing access to training, conducting internal quality reviews of audit reports, facilitating peer feedback, and encouraging a culture of open discussion about technical and ethical challenges.

CONCLUSION

This Assessor Code of Conduct is more than a list of rules; it is the embodiment of the profession’s social contract. It promises clients a service of integrity, objectivity, and tangible value. It demands from assessors the highest standards of personal ethics, professional judgment, and technical skill. In a world increasingly reliant on verification, assurance, and trusted data, the role of the professional assessor is crucial. By internalizing and rigorously applying the principles contained herein—from the broad commitment to putting the client first, down to the meticulous handling of digital evidence—assessors uphold the trust placed in them.

They cease to be mere inspectors of compliance and become genuine partners in progress, helping organizations not just to prove their capability, but to genuinely enhance it. The ultimate success of this code is measured not in the avoidance of complaints, but in the sustained improvement and confidence it fosters across the entire business community.

Branches

SDAB Accreditation

SDAB Head Office

SDAB Sanatan Dharma Accreditation Board
SDAB House
C/O Mr.Garry 54, Glengarnock Avenue,
E-14 3BP Isle Of Dogs, London UK
Tel .: +44-8369083940
email: info@sanatanboards.com
Website: www.sanatanboards.com

MUMBAI Head Office

Sanatan Dharma Accreditation Board (SDAB)
SDAB House
B-401, New Om Kaveri Chs. Ltd., Nagindas pada,
Next To Shiv Sena Office, Nallasopara (E)
Tel .: +91-7499991895
email: info@sanatanboards.com
Website: www.sanatanboards.com

DELHI-NCR Regd. Office

Sanatan Dharma Accreditation Board (SDAB)
SDAB House
Asaoti, Dist Palwal
Faridabad Delhi NCR, Haryana
Tel .: +91-7979801035
Fax: +91-250 2341170
Website: www.sanatanboards.com

sanatanboards