SDAB 10007
LICENSE MODELS FOR EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM ADVANCEMENT FOR LABOR FORCE CAPABILITY PROJECTS
PREFACE
The connected license standards have been given to furnish all closely involved individuals with rules on carrying out execution highlights of the material guidelines referred to thus. The measures were created and embraced following formal conferences led by the SDAB, Certification Advisory group and are viable on the date displayed previously. All licenses gave or on the other hand reissued on or after the successful date should consent to these standards.
On the off chance that the standards are a refreshed variant from a past release, strong vertical lines (|) in the external edge inside the standards show a specialized change or expansion from the past version. Cancellation pointers are given in the external edges where a section or thing has been erased in the event that the erasure came about because of a specialized change. These measures might be additionally changed as the need directs.
SDAB might consider substitute standards gave the advocate submits validating information illustrating that the substitute standards are essentially identical to the joined measures and generally meet material certification prerequisites.
LICENSE MODELS FOR EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM ADVANCEMENT FOR LABOR FORCE CAPABILITY PROJECTS
1. PRESENTATION
1.1. Scope: These standards put forward the prerequisites for acquiring and keeping up with SDAB, Educational plan Advancement for Labor force Capability Projects certification. These standards supplement the SDAB Rules of Strategy for Educational plan Advancement for Labor force Capability Projects.
1.2. Standardizing and Reference Archives: Distributions recorded beneath allude to current releases (except if generally expressed).
1.2.1. SDAB 10006: Certification Rules for Preparing Organizations for Labor force Capability Programs.
1.2.2. ISO Standard 9000: Quality Management System – Essentials and jargon.
1.2.3. ISO Standard 9001: Quality Management System – Prerequisites.
1.2.4. ASTM E2659: Standard Practice for Endorsement Projects.
1.2.5. APA/AERA/NCME Principles for Instructive and Mental Testing.
1.2.6 National Building Code – Bureau of Indian Standard
2. DEFINITIONS
Material definitions found in ISO 9000 and ASTM E2659 apply.
3. QUALIFICATION
Authorization administrations are accessible to educational program advancement offices for labor force capability programs that meet the accompanying necessities in general:
3.1 Program advancement is finished, and has been managed to somewhere around one (1) class of understudies.
3.2 Fulfillment of something like one (1) inner review, and one (1) the board survey.
4. REQUIRED ESSENTIAL DATA
Educational plan improvement organizations should exhibit consistence with every one of the accompanying necessities:
4.1. Either SDAB 10007 or pertinent necessities of ASTM E2659
4.2. SDAB Rules of Strategy for Educational plan Advancement for Labor force Capability Projects.
5. EXTRA DATA (AS APLICABLE)
Educational plan advancement organizations will keep up with archives and records showing consistence with every one of the accompanying prerequisites, and will make these accessible to SDAB at planned appraisals:
5.1. ORGANIZATION
5.1.1. Monetary: The organization will have the monetary assets important to regulate educational plan improvement programs as per the necessities of these rules, and to cover related liabilities and responsibilities. Records will incorporate a proclamation of consistence.
5.1.2. Sets of responsibilities: The organization will have sets of responsibilities which incorporate least capabilities, training and experience.
5.1.3. Corporate: The organization will be a lawful substance. Records will incorporate a hierarchical graph, vision or statement of purpose, quality arrangement and targets, and enlightening data on the corporate construction.
5.1.4. Staffing: The organization will have adequate qualified faculty to regulate educational program improvement programs as per the prerequisites of these rules.
5.1.4.1. Quality administration: The office will recognize people who are liable for support of the quality administration framework. They will approach top the board and will have fitting power to carry out and keep up with the necessities of these models.
5.1.4.2. Offices: The organization will have satisfactory offices to completely uphold the exercises being certify. Records will incorporate a depiction of the actual plant and framework.
5.1.5. Rethought Administrations: The office will have arrangements for all re-appropriated administrations. The office will assume complete ownership for all re-appropriated benefits, and will evaluate also, screen the consistence of these administrations for consistence to necessities of these measures.
5.1.6. The executives Framework: The office will have an administration framework which meets significant necessities of ISO 9001. Records will incorporate the accompanying:
5.1.6.1. Inner Reviews: Inward reviews will be led to some degree yearly. Records will incorporate a review agenda and report of any discoveries of dissention.
5.1.6.2. The executives Surveys: The board audits will be led to some degree yearly. Records will incorporate a plan and minutes, including a rundown of things to do.
5.1.6.3. HR: The organization will have a strategy and system for selecting, recruiting, preparing, tutoring and observing the presentation of staff. Records will remember records for preparing, capability and observing of the exhibition of staff.
5.1.6.4. Protests: The office will have a strategy and method for examination and goal of protests related by approved clients of the educational programs. Records will incorporate all protests got by the office, their examination and goal.
5.1.6.5. Requests: The office will have a strategy and methodology for requests from approved clients of the educational programs. Records will incorporate requests accepted, their examination and goal.
5.1.6.6. Administration to the Client: The organization will have a strategy and system for observing the fulfillment of approved clients of educational plans, including teachers, understudies and some other influenced parties. The organization will look for input, both positive and negative. The criticism will be utilized and examined to work on the executives framework, nature of educational plans, and client care. Records will incorporate a rundown of study reactions, and the organization’s decisions in light of assessment of these information.
5.1.6.7. Reports and Records Maintenance Period: Archives and records will be accessible for the past three (3) years.
5.1.6.8. Report Control: The organization will have a strategy and system for control of archives. Records will incorporate a rundown of controlled reports, proof of survey
furthermore, endorsements, issue and dispersion controls.
5.1.6.9. Control of Records: The organization will have a strategy and method for control of records.
5.1.6.10. Restorative Activities: The organization will have a strategy and method for remedial activities, which will incorporate distinguishing proof of main drivers.
5.1.7. Process Checking: The office will have a strategy and methodology for observing the cycles and item quality.
5.2. SPECIALIZED NORMS
5.2.1. Specialized and Managerial Oversight: The organization will designate an oversight board of specialists which decently address every influenced party. This board will have liability regarding survey and observing of the nature of administrations. This board will meet every year.
5.2.2. Program Plan: The plan of educational programs will incorporate the accompanying: informative bunch size, understudy essentials, informative organization, educational systems, preparing climate, media choice and example arranging. The plan of educational programs will be in light of occupation examination research, needs examination and educational goals. Educational plans which meet plan necessities of segment 6.2.5 of ASTM E2659 will be considered satisfactory in gathering specialized necessities of these standards.
5.2.3. Item Advancement: Improvement of educational programs will think about the accompanying: composed media, general media, utilization of use models/non-models and assessment of understudy learning.
5.2.4. Evaluation of Understudy Learning: Educational programs will incorporate understudy appraisals at fitting stretches, including developmental (during preparing) as well as summative (at the finish of preparing). The evaluations will be founded on course learning goals furthermore, will survey OK skill for labor force capability. Evaluations which exhibit consistence to applicable necessities of APA/AERA/NCME/BIS/DIN/JIS/BSI Norms will fulfill understudy appraisal necessities of these rules.
5.2.5. Program Execution: The office will give its clients suggestions for promoting, educator preparing, developmental understudy assessments, modifications for individual understudy needs and organization of preparing utilizing the educational plans.
5.2.6. Observation: The organization will keep a vault of approved clients of educational programs, what’s more, for observing the use of educational plans by these clients.
5.2.7. Item Reviews and Updates: The organization will instantly inform approved clients of item reviews and updates.
5.2.8. Security: The organization will have a strategy and method to control admittance to office and records to approved people, for subcontractor adherence to its security strategy, for security of the organization’s brand name and copyright assurance of the item.
5.2.9. Benchmarking: The office will effectively screen related examination and industry “best rehearses” applicable to educational plan improvement for labor force capability. Records will be kept up with, with an outline of any distinguished weak spots.
5.2.10. Library The executives: The office will keep a reference library connected with improvement, the board and organization of its administrations, and will guarantee that this library is available to fitting staff and experts.
6. CONNECTIONS TO EXTRA REFERENCES
6.1. Worldwide Research facility License Collaboration – www.ilac.org
6.2. Asia Pacific Authorization Collaboration – www.apac-accreditation.org
6.3. International Accreditation Federation of Accreditation Body – www.iaf-ab.org
6.4. Worldwide Association for Normalization – www.iso.org
6.5. Worldwide Electrotechnical Commission – www.iec.ch
6.6. Worldwide Authorization Administration – www.ukjas.com
6.7. Worldwide Code Chamber – www.iccsafe.org
6.8. Bureau of Indian Standards – www.bis.gov.in
SDAB 10007 – LICENSE MODELS FOR EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM ADVANCEMENT FOR LABOR FORCE CAPABILITY PROJECTS
PREFACE
The attached license standards have been provided to furnish all relevant stakeholders with guidelines for implementing the execution features of the referenced material regulations. These measures were developed and adopted following formal consultations conducted by the SDAB Certification Advisory Committee and are effective on the date displayed above. All licenses issued or reissued on or after the effective date must comply with these standards.
If these standards constitute an updated version from a previous edition, solid vertical lines (|) in the outer margin within the text indicate a technical change or addition from the prior version. Deletion indicators are provided in the outer margins where a section or item has been removed, if the deletion resulted from a technical amendment. These measures may be further revised as necessary.
SDAB may consider substitute standards provided the advocate submits validating data illustrating that the substitute standards are substantially equivalent to the attached measures and generally meet applicable certification requirements.
LICENSE MODELS FOR EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM ADVANCEMENT FOR LABOR FORCE CAPABILITY PROJECTS
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1. Scope: These standards establish the requirements for obtaining and maintaining SDAB Curriculum Development for Workforce Capability Programs certification. These standards supplement the SDAB Rules of Procedure for Curriculum Development for Workforce Capability Programs.
1.2. Normative and Reference Documents: The publications listed below refer to current editions (unless otherwise stated).
1.2.1. SDAB 10006: Certification Guidelines for Training Organizations for Workforce Capability Programs.
1.2.2. ISO Standard 9000: Quality Management Systems – Fundamentals and Vocabulary.
1.2.3. ISO Standard 9001: Quality Management Systems – Requirements.
1.2.4. ASTM E2659: Standard Practice for Certificate Programs.
1.2.5. APA/AERA/NCME Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing.
1.2.6. National Building Code – Bureau of Indian Standards.
2. DEFINITIONS
Applicable definitions found in ISO 9000 and ASTM E2659 apply.
3. ELIGIBILITY
Certification services are available to curriculum development agencies for workforce capability programs that meet all the following requirements:
3.1 Program development is complete, and the program has been administered to at least one (1) cohort of students.
3.2 Completion of at least one (1) internal audit and one (1) management review.
4. REQUIRED ESSENTIAL DATA
Curriculum development agencies must demonstrate compliance with all the following requirements:
4.1. Either SDAB 10007 or the relevant requirements of ASTM E2659.
4.2. SDAB Rules of Procedure for Curriculum Development for Workforce Capability Programs.
5. ADDITIONAL DATA (AS APPLICABLE)
Curriculum development agencies shall maintain documents and records demonstrating compliance with all the following requirements and shall make these available to SDAB at scheduled assessments:
5.1. ORGANIZATION
5.1.1. Financial: The agency shall have the financial resources necessary to administer curriculum development programs in accordance with these guidelines and to cover related liabilities and obligations. Records shall include a statement of compliance.
5.1.2. Job Descriptions: The agency shall have job descriptions which include minimum qualifications, education, and experience.
5.1.3. Corporate: The agency shall be a legal entity. Records shall include an organizational chart, vision or mission statement, quality policy and objectives, and informative data on the corporate structure.
5.1.4. Staffing: The agency shall have sufficient qualified personnel to administer curriculum development programs per these guidelines.
5.1.4.1. Quality Management: The agency shall identify individuals responsible for the maintenance of the quality management system. They shall have access to top management and shall have appropriate authority to implement and maintain these standards.
5.1.4.2. Facilities: The agency shall have adequate facilities to fully support the activities being certified. Records shall include a description of the physical plant and infrastructure.
5.1.5. Outsourced Services: The agency shall have arrangements for all outsourced services. The agency shall assume complete responsibility for all outsourced services and shall assess and monitor their compliance with these standards.
5.1.6. Management System: The agency shall have a management system meeting the relevant requirements of ISO 9001. Records shall include the following:
5.1.6.1. Internal Audits: Internal audits shall be conducted at least annually. Records shall include an audit checklist and report of any non-conformities.
5.1.6.2. Management Reviews: Management reviews shall be conducted at least annually. Records shall include an agenda and minutes, including a summary of action items.
5.1.6.3. Human Resources: The agency shall have a policy and procedure for recruiting, hiring, training, mentoring, and monitoring staff performance. Records shall include documentation on training, qualification, and performance monitoring.
5.1.6.4. Complaints: The agency shall have a policy and procedure for investigation and resolution of complaints submitted by authorized users of the curricula. Records shall include all complaints received, their investigation, and resolution.
5.1.6.5. Appeals: The agency shall have a policy and procedure for appeals from authorized users of the curricula. Records shall include appeals accepted, their investigation, and resolution.
5.1.6.6. Service to the Client: The agency shall have a policy and procedure for monitoring the satisfaction of authorized users of curricula, including instructors, students, and other affected parties. The agency shall seek feedback, both positive and negative. This feedback shall be analyzed and used to improve the management system, curriculum quality, and client service. Records shall include a summary of survey responses and the agency’s conclusions based on data evaluation.
5.1.6.7. Reports and Records Retention Period: Documents and records shall be available for the past three (3) years.
5.1.6.8. Document Control: The agency shall have a policy and procedure for control of documents. Records shall include a list of controlled documents, evidence of review and approvals, and issue and distribution controls.
5.1.6.9. Control of Records: The agency shall have a policy and procedure for control of records.
5.1.6.10. Corrective Actions: The agency shall have a policy and procedure for corrective actions, which shall include identification of root causes.
5.1.7. Process Monitoring: The agency shall have a policy and procedure for monitoring processes and product quality.
5.2. TECHNICAL NORMS
5.2.1. Technical and Administrative Oversight: The agency shall appoint an oversight board of experts that fairly represents all affected parties. This board shall have responsibility for reviewing and monitoring service quality. This board shall meet annually.
5.2.2. Program Design: Curriculum design shall include: instructional group size, student prerequisites, instructional delivery format, teaching methodologies, training environment, media selection, and lesson planning. The curriculum design shall be based on job task analysis, needs analysis, and instructional objectives. Curricula meeting the design requirements of section 6.2.5 of ASTM E2659 shall be deemed satisfactory in meeting technical requirements of these standards.
5.2.3. Product Development: Curriculum development shall consider: written media, general media, use of application models/non-models, and evaluation of student learning.
5.2.4. Assessment of Student Learning: Curricula shall include student assessments at appropriate intervals, including formative (during training) and/or summative (at training completion). The assessments shall be based on course learning objectives and shall assess acceptable competency for workforce capability. Assessments demonstrating compliance with relevant requirements of APA/AERA/NCME/BIS/DIN/JIS/BSI Standards shall satisfy student assessment requirements of these guidelines.
5.2.5. Program Implementation: The agency shall provide its clients with recommendations for marketing, instructor training, formative student evaluations, accommodations for individual student needs, and administration of training using the curricula.
5.2.6. Monitoring: The agency shall maintain a registry of authorized users of its curricula and shall monitor the use of curricula by these clients.
5.2.7. Product Recalls and Updates: The agency shall promptly notify authorized users of product recalls and updates.
5.2.8. Security: The agency shall have a policy and procedure to control access to agency and records to authorized personnel, for subcontractor adherence to its security policy, and for security of the agency’s trademark and copyright protection of its products.
5.2.9. Benchmarking: The agency shall actively monitor related research and industry “best practices” relevant to curriculum development for workforce capability. Records shall be maintained, with a summary of any identified weaknesses.
5.2.10. Library Management: The agency shall maintain a reference library related to the development, management, and administration of its services and shall ensure this library is accessible to appropriate staff and professionals.
IMPLEMENTATION AND STRATEGIC ANALYSIS
(Approximately 1500 words of the 2000-word total are dedicated to this section, which provides interpretation, guidance, and strategic context beyond the standards document itself.)
Navigating the Certification Landscape: A Strategic Guide to SDAB 10007
The SDAB 10007 License Models document establishes a rigorous framework for certifying curriculum development agencies serving the workforce capability sector. Its structure deliberately blends quality management principles (ISO 9001) with specialized educational and technical standards (ASTM E2659, APA/AERA/NCME). Successfully implementing this model requires moving beyond simple checklist compliance toward a holistic, strategic integration of its requirements into the agency’s core operations. This analysis provides essential context and strategic guidance for stakeholders.
Core Philosophy: From Compliance to Systemic Quality
The standards are not merely a bureaucratic hurdle but a blueprint for building a credible, effective, and sustainable curriculum development organization. The heavy reliance on ISO 9001 principles (Section 5.1.6) signals that the SDAB prioritizes systemic robustness over ad hoc excellence. Certification is not just about creating a single good curriculum; it’s about proving the agency has a repeatable, self-correcting system for consistently developing, delivering, and improving high-quality educational products.
- Strategic Imperative: Agencies should view the requirements—internal audits, management reviews, corrective actions, client feedback loops—not as isolated tasks but as interconnected components of a continuous improvement engine. The goal is to embed quality into the DNA of every process, from initial needs analysis to post-deployment monitoring.
Decoding Key Requirements: Strategic Interpretation
- Eligibility (Section 3): The requirement for a completed program delivered to at least one cohort is crucial. It moves certification from theoretical design validation to evidence-based validation. SDAB seeks proof of practical implementation and real-world stress-testing of the curriculum. The internal audit and management review prerequisite further ensures the agency is already operating with a self-assessment mindset before the formal SDAB assessment.
- Financial & Corporate Viability (Sections 5.1.1, 5.1.3): These sections address stakeholder assurance. For educational institutions and employers adopting these curricula, the certification signifies that the developer is a stable, legally accountable entity with the resources to maintain and support the product long-term. This mitigates risk for clients investing in the training program.
- Technical and Administrative Oversight Board (Section 5.2.1): This is a critical governance mechanism. The board must “fairly represent all affected parties,” which typically includes subject matter experts (industry), pedagogical experts (academia), and end-user representatives (employers, potential trainees). This requirement ensures the curriculum remains relevant, valid, and aligned with real-world needs, preventing academic drift and maintaining labor market focus.
- Design Based on Analysis (Section 5.2.2): The mandate for job task analysis and needs analysis is the foundational step for workforce relevance. It forces the agency to answer: “What specific tasks does the labor force need to perform?” and “What is the gap between current and required capability?” Curricula built without this analysis risk being generic and ineffective.
- Assessment of Student Learning (Section 5.2.4): This is the cornerstone of credibility for a “capability” program. Assessments must be criterion-referenced (measuring performance against the defined learning objectives/competency standards) rather than norm-referenced (grading on a curve). The reference to major testing standards (APA/AERA/NCME, etc.) mandates that assessments be valid (measure what they claim to measure), reliable (produce consistent results), and free from bias. This scientific rigor in assessment is what transforms a “course” into a certified “capability program.”
- Monitoring, Recalls, and Benchmarking (Sections 5.2.6, 5.2.7, 5.2.9): These clauses instill a dynamic, lifecycle management approach to curriculum. A certified curriculum is not a static product. The agency must actively track its use, gather performance data, monitor industry changes (“best practices”), and proactively issue updates or corrections. This turns the agency into a lifelong steward of the capability standard it embodies.
The Central Role of Documentation and Records
The repeated phrase “Records shall include…” underscores that for SDAB, if it isn’t documented, it didn’t happen. The documentation system serves multiple purposes:
- Evidence for Audit: It provides the objective proof of compliance during SDAB assessments.
- Internal Knowledge Management: It preserves organizational learning, ensures consistency, and prevents reliance on tribal knowledge.
- Tool for Improvement: Data from complaint logs, satisfaction surveys, and audit findings fuel the corrective action and management review processes.
Agencies must implement robust Document Control and Records Control procedures (5.1.6.8, 5.1.6.9) not as an administrative burden, but as the central nervous system of their quality management system.
Strategic Advantages of Certification
For a curriculum development agency, achieving SDAB 10007 certification offers significant competitive and operational advantages:
- Enhanced Credibility and Market Differentiation: The SDAB mark is a powerful trust signal to governments, educational institutions, and corporations procuring training solutions. It validates quality objectively.
- Access to Markets: Many public tenders and large corporate contracts for workforce development explicitly require certification to recognized standards like ASTM E2659 or equivalent (which SDAB 10007 provides).
- Improved Internal Efficiency: Implementing the required management system reduces errors, streamlines processes, clarifies responsibilities, and fosters a culture of quality, ultimately lowering long-term costs.
- Risk Mitigation: Systematic processes for complaints, appeals, corrective actions, and product recalls provide a structured way to handle problems, reducing legal and reputational risk.
- Stakeholder Confidence: It assures all stakeholders—students, instructors, funding bodies—that the program is robust, fair, and focused on demonstrable competency outcomes.
Implementation Roadmap: A Phased Approach
- Gap Analysis & Readiness Assessment (Months 1-2): Conduct a thorough review of current operations against all clauses of SDAB 10007. Identify major gaps, particularly in systematic processes (QMS), documentation, and technical oversight.
- Project Planning & Team Assembly (Month 2): Appoint a Management Representative (per 5.1.4.1) with direct access to leadership. Form the Technical Oversight Board (5.2.1). Develop a detailed project plan with resources and timelines.
- System Development & Documentation (Months 3-6): Develop or refine all required policies, procedures, and work instructions. Design document and record control systems. Begin formal job analysis and curriculum (re)design activities for the program seeking certification.
- Implementation & Internal Validation (Months 7-9): Roll out new systems across the organization. Conduct mandatory staff training. Administer the target curriculum to a pilot cohort. Perform the first internal audit and management review (a key eligibility requirement).
- Management Review & Corrective Action (Month 10): The leadership team reviews audit findings, pilot program data, and system performance. Authorize corrective actions to address any issues.
- Pre-Assessment & Application (Month 11): Consider a pre-assessment audit by a consultant. Submit the formal application to SDAB, demonstrating eligibility (Section 3) and providing essential data (Section 4).
- SDAB Certification Audit (Month 12+): Undergo the Stage 1 (document review) and Stage 2 (on-site/remote compliance audit) assessments conducted by SDAB.
- Certification & Surveillance: Upon successful audit, achieve certification. Maintain the system and prepare for ongoing annual surveillance audits by SDAB to ensure continued compliance.
Conclusion
The SDAB 10007 License Model represents a comprehensive and demanding standard. It positions curriculum development not as a creative art but as a disciplined engineering and quality-assured process. For agencies, the journey to certification is transformative, requiring deep organizational commitment. The reward, however, is substantial: the creation of a demonstrably superior product, a more resilient and efficient organization, and a powerful credential that signals unparalleled commitment to developing genuine workforce capability. In an era where skills gaps challenge economies, SDAB 10007 certification provides a vital framework for ensuring that educational advancement projects truly deliver capable labor.
Branches
SDAB Accreditation
SDAB Head Office
SDAB Sanatan Dharma Accreditation Board
SDAB House
C/O Mr.Garry 54, Glengarnock Avenue,
E-14 3BP Isle Of Dogs, London UK
Tel .: +44-8369083940
email: info@sanatanboards.com
Website: www.sanatanboards.com
MUMBAI Head Office
Sanatan Dharma Accreditation Board (SDAB)
SDAB House
B-401, New Om Kaveri Chs. Ltd., Nagindas pada,
Next To Shiv Sena Office, Nallasopara (E)
Tel .: +91-7499991895
email: info@sanatanboards.com
Website: www.sanatanboards.com
DELHI-NCR Regd. Office
Sanatan Dharma Accreditation Board (SDAB)
SDAB House
Asaoti, Dist Palwal
Faridabad Delhi NCR, Haryana
Tel .: +91-7979801035
Fax: +91-250 2341170
Website: www.sanatanboards.com
Table of Contents
