ACCREDITATION OF TRAINING COURSES

Authorization of Instructional Classes – SDAB TC:2023

Instructional class authorization to our distributed standard SDAB TC:2023 is suitable for courses conveying individual or business improvement, specialized abilities, proficient capabilities, and so forth. Course conveyance can be by means of homeroom-based learning, virtual learning or eLearning, or mixed learning.

License Levels

SDAB comprehends that different instructional classes require various degrees of consistence and administration. A course composed for interior use might require less powerful oversight than one that is being proposed to outsiders, which might include authoritative commitments. By adopting a layered strategy, associations can pick the degree of consistence proper to their instructional class necessities. Consequently, the SDAB TC:2023 standard elements three levels explicitly customized to the preparation suppliers.

Level 1 (SDAB TC-1:2023)

The Level 1 standard gives the base necessities to vigorous inside instructional classes. This incorporates evaluating preparing needs, setting course goals and results, course improvement, and benefit assessment.

Level 2 (SDAB TC-2:2023)

Notwithstanding the Level 1 appraisal measures, the SDAB Level Two Norm (Level Two) incorporates thought of conveyance strategies and staffing necessities. A Level 2 course is planned and conveyed by a business office or the association.

Level 3 (SDAB TC-3:2023)

Notwithstanding the Level 2 appraisal measures, the SDAB Level Three Norm (Level Three) incorporates course names, results, themes list, conveyance technique and staffing, and Level One evaluation rules, certifications of staff, way to deal with be utilized, and esteem accomplished. A Level 3 course is planned and conveyed by a committed preparation association or establishment.

For capability plots that require intermittent assessment or CPD, license to ISO/IEC 17024
(Conformity evaluation — General prerequisites for bodies working certification of people) might be more reasonable. For ISO/IEC 17024 license, kindly see here, or reach us for more direction in regards to which certification plot is more reasonable for your requirements.

Authorization of Instructional Classes – Stages

Authorization of instructional classes is accomplished in stages. These are:

• Application, see structure
• Audit application and, if fitting, issue a receipt
• Settlement of the receipt by the candidate
• Accommodation of recorded proof and course materials by the candidate
• Appraisal of submitted materials by an assessor as per the applicable level

Authorization of instructional classes is accomplished in stages

• SDAB TC:2023 standard (accessible upon demand).
• Survey of evaluation discoveries gave to the candidate.
• Restorative activity for any non-congruities.
• Evaluation put together by the assessor for SDAB’s license choice.
• Temporary license choice.
• Contract and MOU arrangement and marks.
• Conveyance of courses.
• Fruitful confirmation obviously audit. Confirmation might involve seeing course conveyance face to face without regard to candidate, audit obviously input structures from understudies or other distant reconnaissance action.
• Full license status and posting at sanatanboards.com
• Account opened by SDAB for understudy/authentication postings.

It is a necessity of certification that all understudies are enrolled with SDAB. This is finished by direct information passage of understudy subtleties by the preparation organization at www.irgao.com. It utilizes a full set-up of security settings to permit preparing suppliers to meet the prerequisites of understudies and public administrative bodies.

Not a necessity all courses show to the preparation supplier are certify by SDAB. In any case, the supplier ought to be clear in all correspondences and advertising to guarantee it isn’t suggested that all courses have been authorized.
The preparation supplier ought to be certain that their association has not been authorize by SDAB (as it were their instructional classes have been licensed) except if the preparation supplier has likewise been authorize to SDAB TP:2023.

Enrollment of understudies will be made with toward the finish of the primary day of participation of each new course. Upon fruitful fulfillment of the course, the enlistment is supported by the preparation supplier.

A Comprehensive Guide to SDAB TC:2023

Introduction to Training Course Accreditation

In an increasingly competitive and specialized global economy, the quality and credibility of training programs have become paramount. Organizations and individuals alike seek assurances that the educational courses they undertake deliver meaningful, standardized, and recognized outcomes. Accreditation serves as the formal, independent verification that a training course meets specific standards of quality, rigor, and effectiveness. The Sanatan Development Accreditation Board (SDAB), through its SDAB TC:2023 standard, provides a robust framework for such accreditation, tailored to the diverse needs of training providers across industries.

This document offers a detailed exploration of the SDAB TC:2023 accreditation process, its tiered structure, procedural stages, and the profound implications for training providers, learners, and the broader educational ecosystem. Spanning the philosophy behind the standard to the practicalities of implementation, this guide aims to be the definitive resource for understanding how accreditation elevates training from a simple activity to a recognized instrument of professional and personal development.

1. The Philosophy and Scope of SDAB TC:2023

1.1. The Need for Standardized Accreditation

The proliferation of training providers and courses, especially with the rise of digital and virtual learning, has created a market of varying quality. Learners and sponsoring organizations face a significant challenge in distinguishing between courses that offer substantive skill development and those that do not. Accreditation by a respected body like SDAB acts as a critical filter, signaling that a course has been rigorously evaluated against established benchmarks. It transforms subjective marketing claims into objective, verified quality.

1.2. Scope and Applicability

The SDAB TC:2023 standard is intentionally broad in its application, designed to accommodate the vast landscape of modern training. It is suitable for courses focused on:

Individual or Business Improvement: Soft skills, leadership, management, and personal effectiveness programs.
Technical Skills: Vocational training, IT certifications, engineering competencies, and hands-on technical instruction.
Professional Qualifications: Courses that prepare individuals for industry-specific roles or regulatory compliance.
Continuous Professional Development (CPD): Learning activities designed to maintain and enhance professional knowledge.

Modes of Delivery: The standard is delivery-agnostic, ensuring its relevance regardless of pedagogical methodology. It fully encompasses:

Classroom-Based Learning: Traditional instructor-led training (ILT).
Virtual Learning: Live, synchronous online instruction.
eLearning: Asynchronous, self-paced online modules.
Blended Learning: A hybrid approach combining any of the above methods.

This flexibility ensures that the quality of the educational experience and outcomes is assessed, not merely the format.

2. The Tiered Approach: License Levels of SDAB TC:2023

A core innovation of the SDAB TC:2023 standard is its recognition that not all training courses serve the same purpose or carry the same risk. A safety certification for nuclear engineers demands a different level of oversight than an in-house software tutorial for a company’s employees. The standard’s three-tiered model allows organizations to select the level of accreditation that matches their course’s intent, audience, and complexity.

2.1. Level 1 (SDAB TC-1:2023): Foundation for Internal Excellence

Primary Audience: Organizations developing training for their own employees or internal stakeholders.
Focus: Establishing a robust, systematic internal training development and delivery process.

Key Requirements:

Needs Analysis: Formal process for identifying and validating the training need within the organization.
Objectives & Outcomes: Clear, measurable statements defining what learners will know, do, or understand upon completion.
Course Development: A structured approach to designing content, materials, and activities that align with the stated objectives.
Benefit Evaluation: A process for assessing the effectiveness and impact of the training post-delivery (e.g., through Kirkpatrick’s Level 1-Reaction and Level 2-Learning evaluations, or through performance metrics).

Value Proposition: Level 1 accreditation provides internal credibility and ensures that organizational training is not an ad-hoc activity but a disciplined function that contributes to strategic goals. It is the blueprint for quality in internal learning and development.

2.2. Level 2 (SDAB TC-2:2023): Enhancing Delivery and Staffing

Primary Audience: Business units or departments that design and deliver training, potentially to other internal departments or closely affiliated external parties.
Focus: Building upon Level 1 by adding rigorous standards for how the course is delivered and who delivers it.

Additional Requirements beyond Level 1:

Delivery Methodology: Justification and quality controls for the chosen delivery mode (classroom, virtual, etc.). This includes criteria for learner engagement, technological reliability, and session management.
Staffing Requirements: Defining the necessary competencies, qualifications, and experience for instructors and facilitators. It mandates processes for instructor selection, briefing, and performance monitoring.

Value Proposition: Level 2 accreditation is ideal for organizations that operate internal “universities” or training departments. It assures stakeholders that the training is not only well-designed but also professionally delivered by competent staff, thereby protecting the organization’s reputation and ensuring consistent learner experiences.

2.3. Level 3 (SDAB TC-3:2023): Comprehensive External Certification

Primary Audience: Dedicated training organizations, institutes, or consultatives that offer courses to the public or to other organizations as a core commercial service.
Focus: The highest level of assurance, suitable for courses that lead to certifications, licenses, or significant professional qualifications.

Additional Requirements beyond Level 2:

Detailed Course Specifications: Formal documentation of the course name, intended learning outcomes, a comprehensive topic list/syllabus, and detailed delivery plans.
Advanced Staff Certification: Demonstration that instructional staff hold specific, relevant certifications or credentials beyond basic competence.
Documented Pedagogical Approach: A defined and justified teaching philosophy or methodology (e.g., experiential learning, scenario-based training).
Demonstration of Value Achieved: Robust methods for evaluating the application of learning and the return on investment (ROI) for the learner or their sponsor (e.g., Kirkpatrick Levels 3-Behavior and 4-Results).
Integration of Level 1 Assessment: Formalized, standardised assessment strategies to validate that learners have met the course objectives.

Value Proposition: Level 3 accreditation is a powerful market differentiator. It signals to potential clients and learners that the course is of the highest quality, backed by a complete and auditable system. It mitigates risk for organizations purchasing training and provides learners with confidence that the certification they earn will be respected in the job market.

3. Complementary Accreditation: ISO/IEC 17024 for Personnel Certification

It is critical to distinguish between course accreditation (SDAB TC:2023) and personnel certification body accreditation (ISO/IEC 17024). They serve related but distinct purposes.

SDAB TC:2023 accredits the training course itself—its design, delivery, and instructional system.
ISO/IEC 17024 accredits the organization that certifies individuals. It governs the entire person certification scheme: exam development, administration, scoring, security, and recertification.

When is ISO/IEC 17024 More Appropriate?
If a training provider operates a formal personnel certification scheme that requires periodic re-examination or the accumulation of Continuous Professional Development (CPD) points to maintain the certification, then accreditation to ISO/IEC 17024 is typically the more relevant and internationally recognized path. It provides assurance that the certification process is fair, valid, reliable, and independent.

SDAB’s Guidance: SDAB explicitly directs providers with such schemes to explore ISO/IEC 17024, offering consultation to help organizations determine the most suitable accreditation path for their specific model.

4. The Accreditation Journey: A Stage-by-Stage Breakdown

Achieving SDAB accreditation is a systematic, collaborative process designed to be transparent and constructive. It is not merely an inspection but an improvement journey.

Stage 1: Initiation & Contractual Agreement

Application: The provider submits a formal application, declaring the course(s) and desired accreditation level.
Review & Quotation: SDAB reviews the application and issues a formal proposal and fee invoice.
Formal Engagement: Upon payment by the provider, a contractual agreement (Memorandum of Understanding – MOU) is signed, defining roles, responsibilities, and confidentiality.

Stage 2: Documentation Review & Desktop Assessment

Evidence Submission: The provider submits all required documented evidence—course materials, design documents, staff CVs, assessment tools, evaluation forms, and process manuals—as per the chosen TC level.
Assessment by Expert: An assigned SDAB lead assessor, an expert in the relevant field and the standard, conducts a thorough desktop assessment of all submitted materials against the SDAB TC:2023 criteria.
Initial Findings Report: The assessor provides a detailed report identifying areas of conformity and any non-conformities (NCs)—requirements not fully met.

Stage 3: Addressing Non-Conformities & Verification

Corrective Action: The provider addresses each NC, providing evidence of root cause analysis and corrective action.
Verification: The assessor reviews the corrective action evidence. For major issues or at higher levels, a follow-up review or a virtual meeting may be required.

Stage 4: Decision & On-Site Verification (For Level 3, often for Level 2)

Assessment Report & Recommendation: The assessor compiles a final report with a recommendation for accreditation to the SDAB decision-making committee.
Provisional Accreditation: A positive decision grants provisional accreditation status. This allows the provider to begin advertising the course as “SDAB-accredited (provisional).”
Verification of Delivery: The critical differentiator. SDAB mandates verification of actual course delivery. This can take several forms, selected based on risk and level:
- Unannounced Observation: An SDAB representative attends a live course session (in-person or virtual) to observe delivery, instructor competence, and learner engagement firsthand.
- Review of Feedback: Analysis of completed student feedback forms and trainer reports from delivered courses.
- Remote Surveillance: Review of recorded sessions, learner assessment results, and other digital artifacts.

Stage 5: Full Accreditation & Ongoing Compliance

Full Accreditation Status: Upon successful verification of course delivery, full accreditation is awarded.
Public Listing: The accredited course is listed on the official SDAB register at sanatanboards.com, providing public verification.
Student Registration Portal – IRGAO: A mandatory and unique feature. The provider must register every student on the SDAB-managed www.irgao.com portal. This:
- Creates a central, secure record of all learners undertaking accredited courses.
- Allows for certificate verification by employers or other parties.
- Provides data for quality monitoring by SDAB.
- Uses robust security settings to protect student data privacy, aligning with global regulations like GDPR.
Ongoing Surveillance: Accreditation is not a one-time event. SDAB conducts annual surveillance reviews and a full re-accreditation audit every three years to ensure continued compliance and improvement.

5. Critical Governance and Communication Rules

To maintain the integrity of the accreditation system, SDAB enforces strict governance rules:

Course-Level vs. Organizational Accreditation: SDAB TC:2023 accredits specific courses, not the entire training provider organization (unless the organization separately achieves SDAB TP:2023 provider accreditation). Marketing must be clear. A provider cannot claim “We are an SDAB-accredited company” based on course accreditation alone. It must state, “Our [Course Name] is accredited by SDAB against the TC:2023 standard.”
Selective Accreditation: Providers are not required to accredit all their courses. However, they must avoid any marketing language that could imply a blanket organizational accreditation. The distinction between accredited and non-accredited offerings must be unambiguous.
Student Registration Timing: The rule is clear: student details must be entered into the IRGAO system by the end of the first day of attendance. Upon the student’s successful completion, the provider confirms this status in the portal, triggering the eligibility for a certificate.

6. The Strategic Value and Impact of Accreditation

For Training Providers:

Enhanced Reputation & Credibility: Accreditation is a third-party endorsement that builds trust with clients and learners.
Competitive Advantage: In a crowded market, accreditation is a key differentiator that can justify premium pricing.
Improved Course Quality: The process itself forces a critical review and systematization of design and delivery, leading to better learning outcomes.
Access to New Markets: Many government tenders and large corporate clients mandate accredited training providers.
Roborous in-house practices for internal L&D departments.

For Learners and Sponsoring Organizations:

Assured Quality: Reduces the risk of investing time and money in substandard training.
Recognized Outcomes: Certificates from accredited courses carry more weight with employers and professional bodies.
Consistency: Ensures that the course delivered matches the course advertised.
Data Security: The IRGAO system provides a secure, verifiable record of achievement.

For Industries and Economies:

Standardization of Skills: Helps create a common language and benchmark for competencies within a sector.
Workforce Development: Elevates the overall skill level by promoting high-quality, outcome-focused training.
Consumer Protection: Acts as a regulatory-like function in less-regulated training markets.

Conclusion

The SDAB TC:2023 accreditation framework represents a sophisticated, responsive, and practical approach to quality assurance in training and development. Its tiered levels acknowledge the diverse ecosystem of training, while its rigorous, stage-gated process ensures that the accreditation mark is a meaningful symbol of excellence. By mandating verification of live delivery and integrating a secure, central student registry, SDAB goes beyond document review to assure the actual implementation and impact of accredited courses.

For any organization serious about demonstrating the quality of its training—whether for internal improvement or external commercial success—engagement with the SDAB TC:2023 accreditation process is a strategic investment. It is a journey that not only yields a credential but fundamentally enhances the training provider’s systems, reputation, and contribution to human capital development. In a world where skills are the ultimate currency, SDAB accreditation provides the mint mark of quality and reliability.

Branches

SDAB Accreditation

SDAB Head Office

SDAB Sanatan Dharma Accreditation Board
SDAB House
C/O Mr.Garry 54, Glengarnock Avenue,
E-14 3BP Isle Of Dogs, London UK
Tel .: +44-8369083940
email: info@sanatanboards.com
Website: www.sanatanboards.com

MUMBAI Head Office

Sanatan Dharma Accreditation Board (SDAB)
SDAB House
B-401, New Om Kaveri Chs. Ltd., Nagindas pada,
Next To Shiv Sena Office, Nallasopara (E)
Tel .: +91-7499991895
email: info@sanatanboards.com
Website: www.sanatanboards.com

DELHI-NCR Regd. Office

Sanatan Dharma Accreditation Board (SDAB)
SDAB House
Asaoti, Dist Palwal
Faridabad Delhi NCR, Haryana
Tel .: +91-7979801035
Fax: +91-250 2341170
Website: www.sanatanboards.com

sanatanboards